2010
DOI: 10.1080/00207391003777871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary teachers’ subject matter knowledge: decimals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature has also documented that primary-school in-service teachers often face similar difficulties that students and pre-service teachers face, not only with proofs but also with many other mathematical contents (see, for instance, Ubuz & Yayan, 2010). For this reason, we agree with Ubuz and Yayan (2010) when stating that "an important step to improving subject matter knowledge should be better subject matter preparation for primary teachers" (p. 799).…”
Section: Some Reflections On the Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The literature has also documented that primary-school in-service teachers often face similar difficulties that students and pre-service teachers face, not only with proofs but also with many other mathematical contents (see, for instance, Ubuz & Yayan, 2010). For this reason, we agree with Ubuz and Yayan (2010) when stating that "an important step to improving subject matter knowledge should be better subject matter preparation for primary teachers" (p. 799).…”
Section: Some Reflections On the Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Finally, previous claims about the need for primary school mathematics teachers to obtain higher levels of mathematics education (particularly in relation to SMK; see Ubuz & Yayan, 2010;Norton, 2012) were only partially backed up by the results of this study.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Whilst not referring to mathematics per se, Shulman differentiated amongst subject matter knowledge (SMK), pedagogic content knowledge (PCK), curriculum knowledge (CK) and five other aspects of knowledge used for teaching. Drawing upon this vocabulary, a number of studies focusing on the mathematics curriculum have been undertaken in an attempt to link SMK (often supported by PCK) to pupils' mathematical achievement (Ball et al, 2005;Goulding et al, 2002;Ma, 1999;National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, 1996;Ofsted, 1994;Ubuz & Yayan, 2010;US DoE, 2008;Wong, Rowland, Chan, Cheung, & Han, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa penelitian sebelumnya juga menyatakan bahwa ada beberapa kesalahan dan kekeliruan siswa dalam menjumlahkan bilangan desimal. Ubuz & Yayan (2010) menyatakan bahwa kekeliruan yang paling umum dilakukan siswa ketika menjumlahan bilangan desimal adalah menambahkan angka terakhir di belakang koma, misalnya ketika menambahkan 0,1 ke 6,98, kemudian siswa memberikan jawaban yang keliru yaitu 6,99 bukan jawaban seharusnya 7,08. Selanjutnya Afriyansyah (2013) menyatakan bahwa kekeliruan ketika siswa menjumlahkan bilangan desimal dengan bilangan bulat misalnya 2,49 + 1 selanjutnya siswa memberikan jawaban yang keliru yaitu 2,50 bukan jawaban seharusnya 3,49 ataupun 19,72 + 9 jawaban siswa adalah 109,72 bukan jawaban seharusnya 28,72.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified