Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: a retrospective cohort study

Zhang, Deng‐Yong; Ma, Yang; Sun, Weili; Wang, Ning; Liu, Zhong; Lu, Zhaoyi

doi:10.1007/s13304-023-01451-5

Updates Surg

2023

DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01451-5

|View full text |Cite

Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: a retrospective cohort study

Deng‐Yong Zhang

Yang Ma

Weili Sun

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction have become common surgical approaches. It is still unclear whether primary closure of the common bile duct should be performed, or whether a T-tube or a double J-tube should be inserted after common bile duct exploration and stone extraction [ 6 – 8 ]. The aim of this study is to explore the different options for managing the common bile duct during laparoscopic exploration and stone extraction, as well as postoperative complications, in patients who undergo this procedure.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration—— a 5-year retrospective analysis

Li,

Zeng,

et al. 2024

BMC Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the indications for three minimally invasive approaches—T-tube external drainage, double J-tube internal drainage, and primary closure—in laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration. Methods Three hundred eighty-nine patients with common bile duct stones who were treated at the Second People's Hospital of Hefei between February 2018 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into three groups based on the surgical approach used: the T-tube drainage group, the double J-tube internal drainage group, and the primary closure group. General data, including sex, age, and BMI, were compared among the three groups preoperatively. Surgical time, length of hospital stay, pain scores, and other aspects were compared among the three groups. Differences in liver function, inflammatory factors, and postoperative complications were also compared among the three groups. Results There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of sex, age, BMI, or other general data preoperatively (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between the primary closure group and the T-tube drainage group in terms of surgical time and pain scores (P < 0.05). The primary closure group and double J-tube drainage group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and time to passage of gas (P <0.05). Among the three groups, there were no statistically significant differences in inflammatory factors or liver function, TBIL, AST, ALP, ALT, GGT, CRP, or IL-6, before surgery or on the third day after surgery (P > 0.05). However, on the third day after surgery, liver function in all three groups was significantly lower than that before surgery (P<0.05). In all three groups, the levels of CRP and IL-6 were significantly lower than their preoperative levels. The primary closure group had significantly lower CRP and IL-6 levels than did the T-tube drainage group (P < 0.05). The primary closure group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of the incidences of bile leakage and electrolyte imbalance (P < 0.05). The double J-tube drainage group differed from the T-tube drainage group in terms of the tube dislodgement rate (P < 0.05). Conclusion Although primary closure of the bile ducts has clear advantages in terms of length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses, it is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications, particularly bile leakage. T-tube drainage and double J-tube internal drainage also have their own advantages. The specific surgical approach should be selected based on the preoperative assessment, indications, and other factors to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration—— a 5-year retrospective analysis

Li,

Zeng,

et al. 2024

BMC Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: a retrospective cohort study

Cited by 1 publication

References 24 publications

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration—— a 5-year retrospective analysis

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of three minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration—— a 5-year retrospective analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About