“…Intracranial angioplasty is an option, however, it has largely been replaced by stenting because of the technical drawbacks associated with angioplasty including immediate elastic recoil of the artery, dissection, acute vessel closure, residual stenosis >50% following the procedure, and high restenosis rates.11-15 Intracranial stenting has emerged as the preferred technique by most interventionalists and is increasingly being used in the United States and other countries. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Most of the experience with intracranial stenting has been with balloon mounted coronary stents but these stents are difficult to deliver in the tortuous intracranial circulation. In August 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) approval for a self-expanding nitinol intracranial stent (the Wingspan stent, Boston Scientific, Fremont, CA) for use in patients with ≥50% intracranial stenosis who have recurrent ischemic events while on antithrombotic therapy.…”