1981
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pu.02.050181.001345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease: Evaluation of Community Interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several longitudinal studies have been conducted in community samples to investigate the relation between lifestyles and illness risk. The Alameda County study (Belloc, 1973;Berkman, Breslow and Wingard, 1983), the Stanford Three Community Project (Winkelstein and Marmot, 1981), and the North Karelia Project (Puska, Vienola, Kotthe, Salomen and NeittaanmaÈ k, 1981) are probably the best known longitudinal studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several longitudinal studies have been conducted in community samples to investigate the relation between lifestyles and illness risk. The Alameda County study (Belloc, 1973;Berkman, Breslow and Wingard, 1983), the Stanford Three Community Project (Winkelstein and Marmot, 1981), and the North Karelia Project (Puska, Vienola, Kotthe, Salomen and NeittaanmaÈ k, 1981) are probably the best known longitudinal studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies indicate: a) it is possible to conduct complicated risk factor intervention trials in community settings; b) behavioral risk factors can be changed; c) the provision of education or information about the need to reduce risk factors is, in itself, insufficient. More attention is needed to understand why people engage in certain behavior and how programs should be designed; and d) the relationship of risk factor change to morbidity and mortality has not been addressed (Winkelstein and Marmot, 1981)• Two aspects of the work are cited above are of special relevance in forging a MH/PH linage: 1) future efforts in this area should include more sophisticated MH input if the success level of these programs and the generalizability beyond the demonstration phase is to occur; 2) these programs provide a model for community-based intervention projects for high prevalence MH conditions that MH professionals might undertake.…”
Section: The Use Of Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of community intervention studies 30 concludes that it is possible to reach large segments of the population and effectively modify risk factors. It is therefore suggested that risk modification should be routinely incorporated into the primary care system.…”
Section: Changing Stroke Trends/nicholls and Johansen 155mentioning
confidence: 99%