2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/2896810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Pericardial Mesothelioma, Which Was Veiled by a Pleural Empyema: A Case Report and Review

Abstract: This case report shows that pleural empyema limits the diagnostic significance of imaging techniques. Hereafter, we present the case of an 82-year-old patient with primary pericardial mesothelioma, which was veiled by a pleural empyema. The patient met the typical triad of signs of heart failure (dyspnea, lower leg oedema), pericardial effusion, and pericarditis. Echocardiography in the identification of pericardial mesotheliomas is low. In this case, the cardiac function could be imaged well, but the tumor co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Echocardiography is often the first-line of cardiac imaging; however, transthoracic echocardiographic findings are often limited to nonspecific pericardial thickening or pericardial fluid 50. While transesophageal echocardiogram has increased sensitivity, inherent limitations in the modality preclude adequate evaluation of structures distant from the transducer, such as the diaphragm, lung parenchyma, and mediastinum 41,53. For these reasons, echocardiography alone is rarely sufficient for evaluation; however, it can be helpful in guiding pericardiocentesis.…”
Section: Malignant Pericardial Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Echocardiography is often the first-line of cardiac imaging; however, transthoracic echocardiographic findings are often limited to nonspecific pericardial thickening or pericardial fluid 50. While transesophageal echocardiogram has increased sensitivity, inherent limitations in the modality preclude adequate evaluation of structures distant from the transducer, such as the diaphragm, lung parenchyma, and mediastinum 41,53. For these reasons, echocardiography alone is rarely sufficient for evaluation; however, it can be helpful in guiding pericardiocentesis.…”
Section: Malignant Pericardial Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPM survival is dismal, ranging between 6 weeks and 15 months, with an average between 3 and 10 months. [39][40][41] However, unlike MPM, the causal relationship between asbestos exposure and malignant pericardial mesothelioma is not well established. A literature review published in 2008 evaluating 29 cases between 1993 and 2008 found that only 3 of the 14 cases had known asbestos exposure.…”
Section: Clinicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Fig 4) Primary pericardial mesothelioma is a highly malignant tumor that has unfavorable prognosis, and is extremely rare, even among heart tumors, with an incidence of <0.002% and accounting for less than 5% of all mesotheliomas. [1] Patients often show nonspecific but typical symptoms like constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, and heart failure. [2] From the limited literature, up to 75 percent of cases were diagnosed postmortem [3] and cytologic analysis of pericardial fluid were often negative [4].…”
Section: Timely Diagnosis Of Primary Pericardial Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients often show nonspecific but typical clinical features such as constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, and heart failure. From the limited literature, up to 75 percent of cases were diagnosed postmortem 3 and cytologic analysis of pericardial fluid was often negative 4 . Echocardiography is the most commonly used investigative tool but is low in the identification of pericardial mesotheliomas.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%