2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary pediatric endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy—A review of 58 procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, he did not report whether they were all primary cases. In fact, whereas avoiding stenting is in line with more recent evidence [2,3], silicone tubes are often employed in revision DCR [4].…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, he did not report whether they were all primary cases. In fact, whereas avoiding stenting is in line with more recent evidence [2,3], silicone tubes are often employed in revision DCR [4].…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 74%
“…When assessing the effect of any additional procedure or adjuvant on the surgical success rate in EN-DCR, the osteotomy size represents a fundamental factor as it can influence the success rate [4,6]. Therefore, we would stimulate Dr Saeed to provide some information in that respect.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-5 A significant proportion of patients may have persistent epiphora after initial EnDCR. Success rates of external and endoscopic approaches have been found to vary between 84.1% and 85% 1,6,7 and 76.5% and 84%, [6][7][8][9] respectively. Revision DCR can be surgically challenging because its success depends on identifying the causative factors and may necessitate additional procedures specific to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) has been the gold standard with over 90% success, 1 while endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EnDCR) rose to popularity due to its less invasive nature. 1,[6][7][8][9] Balloon dacryoplasty has existed for over 2 decades. [2][3][4][5] Inappropriately sized or located bony ostium, common canalicular obstruction, and scarring within the anastomosis were the most common causes of failure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimally invasive surgery is well established in all areas of modern surgery. Since the advent of nasal endoscopy, a variety of techniques have been used in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, and the endonasal approach being the most widely used [4,13,14]. Disadvantages of the endonasal method include orbital perforation multiple instrumentation inside the nose, and a long learning curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%