2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary pan-computed tomography for blunt multiple trauma: can the whole be better than its parts?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 Injuries that can only be visualized by a whole-body scan may overemphasize the severity of the injury and artificially increase the ratio of observed to expected survivors. 14,23 However, our data give support to the alternative theory that a primary pan-scan effectively omits many diagnostic steps between clinical suspicion and definitive proof of injuries that require immediate therapeutic attention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…12,13 Injuries that can only be visualized by a whole-body scan may overemphasize the severity of the injury and artificially increase the ratio of observed to expected survivors. 14,23 However, our data give support to the alternative theory that a primary pan-scan effectively omits many diagnostic steps between clinical suspicion and definitive proof of injuries that require immediate therapeutic attention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Such data is relevant to this discussion, since full-body CT scans generate a radiation dose of 10-30mSv 6,8,[11][12][13][14][15] , which is up to 1,000 times greater than that of a PA chest X-ray, whose estimated dose is 0.01mSv 16 . Thus, a study which can demonstrate the safety of conventional tests, compared to full-body CT scans, can contribute greatly in improving the logistics of referrals to large Brazilian trauma centers 17,18 . Many recent articles describe the benefits of full-body CT scans, however few compare this strategy with conventional imaging, or selective tomography 4 .…”
Section: Results Results Results Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this was a retrospective, observational study, a causal relationship between WBCT and decreased mortality cannot be proven. 2,5 Scanning methods and indications for WBCT depended on the protocol of each emergency center, about which no information was available. Because data of TRISS predictors or outcomes were missing in the JTDB, the Ps values could only be calculated for 5,208 patients, 75.9% of the eligible 6,858 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%