1963
DOI: 10.1097/00003081-196312000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Ovarian Cancer Associated With Pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suggested that serial measurements of tumor marker CA125 especially combined with ultrasound, increase the sensitivity of ovarian cancer diagnosis [9]. Some studies suggested removal of ovarian mass during pregnancy for three reasons: 1. elimination of a potential dystocia cause, 2. risk of rupture, torsion and hemorrhage and 3. potential risk of malignancy [10,11]. Considering the risk of miscarriages after surgery and the differential diagnosis of Doppler approach, other studies suggested that exploratory laparotomy only for persistent masses with suspicious for malignancy sonographic characteristics [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested that serial measurements of tumor marker CA125 especially combined with ultrasound, increase the sensitivity of ovarian cancer diagnosis [9]. Some studies suggested removal of ovarian mass during pregnancy for three reasons: 1. elimination of a potential dystocia cause, 2. risk of rupture, torsion and hemorrhage and 3. potential risk of malignancy [10,11]. Considering the risk of miscarriages after surgery and the differential diagnosis of Doppler approach, other studies suggested that exploratory laparotomy only for persistent masses with suspicious for malignancy sonographic characteristics [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When pelvic sonography was not available three decades ago, tumors were identified as incidental findings during the initial routine prenatal pelvic examinations or at Caesarean section, and consequently the majority of ovarian neoplasms during pregnancy were not detected until they were well advanced (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)15). In our 10 cases, ovarian tumors were all detected by ultrasound and the diagnoses were all made at stage I, demonstrating the distinguished scientific benefit of pelvic sonography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these tumors are relatively asymptomatic, they become evident in a routine ultrasonographic scan (2). Almost three decades ago, pelvic ultrasonography was not available and tumors were discovered as incidental findings during the initial routine prenatal pelvic examinations or at Caesarean section in symptomless patients (3)(4)(5)(6)(7). The prenatal courses were usually uneventful, causing the occasional delayed diagnosis (3) and the difficulty of early detection was emphasized (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Munnell (1963), and Graver and Barber (1973) also indicated that when low grade mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, arrhenoblastoma, dysgerminoma, granulosa theca cell tumor or low grade papillary tumor is observed at its Stage Ia during pregnancy, the disease can be treated only by resection of an affected ovary.…”
Section: Postoperative Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jubb (1963a) studied 34 patients collected from the reports from eight institutions in Toronto City between 1882 and 1963, and found that a malignancy rate in the ovarian tumors associated with pregnancy was 2.2-5.0%. Munnell (1963) also reported the rate of malignant ovarian tumor in pregnant women is one to 18,000 of delivaries for 15-year period and Chung and Birnbaum (1973), one to 25,000 of delivaries between 1951 and 1970. This paper presents an EST which developed in a patient in the seventh week of pregnancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%