1979
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197906)43:6<2163::aid-cncr2820430602>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary osteogenic sarcoma. The rationale for preoperative chemotherapy and delayed surgery

Abstract: From 1973From -1975 patients with biopsied primary osteogenic sarcoma were treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgical ablation of the primary tumor. Surgery was delayed in order to obtain a custom-fitted prosthetic bone implant in an attempt to avoid amputation. Preoperative chemotherapy included high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) with citrovorum factor rescue (CFR) and adriamycin (T-5 protocol) and was administered for 3 months preoperatively and continued with the inclusion of cyclophosphamide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
210
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 543 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
210
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was introduced in the late 1970s and this is now accepted as one of standard treatments for metastasis-free osteosarcoma (21,22). The advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are the early treatment of potentially undetectable micrometastasis and the opportunity to assess the histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was introduced in the late 1970s and this is now accepted as one of standard treatments for metastasis-free osteosarcoma (21,22). The advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are the early treatment of potentially undetectable micrometastasis and the opportunity to assess the histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] In addition to prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy, most treatment programs for osteosarcoma now also incorporate preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. Rosen et al 1,[32][33][34] were the first to advocate preoperative chemotherapy and proposed a rationale for this therapeutic approach. Also, preoperative chemotherapy provides early treatment for patients with systemic, occult micrometastases and a detailed histologic evaluation of their response to chemotherapy in the resected specimen by grading the degree of tumor necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, preoperative chemotherapy causes shrinkage of the tumor by necrosis, which makes conservative surgical resections feasible and allows time to plan definitive local therapy for primary tumors. 1,[32][33][34][35] This conservative surgery may include en bloc resection of the tumor. 32,35,36 By convention, patients with osteosarcoma of the flat bones are excluded from clinical trials of new adjuvant therapies; hence, little is known about the impact of such therapy on this subgroup of tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] The protocols consisted of multiagent chemotherapy and/or surgery totaling 40 weeks with some variations in the actual treatment period. Patients treated according to the T4 protocol received adjuvant chemotherapy following surgical resection of their primary tumor.…”
Section: Treatment Receivedmentioning
confidence: 99%