Primary Open Latarjet Procedure Results in Functional Differences but No Structural Changes in Subscapularis Muscle Quality vs the Healthy Contralateral Shoulder at Long-term Follow-up
Abstract:Background: There are concerns that the Latarjet procedure results in loss of glenohumeral rotation and strength and in subscapularis dysfunction. The long-term effects of this procedure on subscapularis quality, glenohumeral rotation, and strength are unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: To analyze the long-term effect of the primary open Latarjet procedure using a muscle-splitting approach on internal and external rotation and strength, as well as subscapularis muscle quality as compared with the healthy contralater… Show more
“…6 However, Ernstbrunner et al reported reduced strength in internal and external rotation of the shoulder after open Latarjet surgery. 7 In a sample of 20 patients, Malavolta et al similarly evaluated shoulder and elbow strength after open Latarjet surgery, however, they reported reduced strength of external rotation and forearm supination, findings that differ from ours. 8 In a sample of 20 patients undergoing open Latarjet surgery, Lacheta et al reported reduced forearm supination strength but did not affect elbow flexion at a mean follow up of 9.8 months.…”
Section: Caubere Et Al Described a Series Of 20 Patients After Opencontrasting
Background The Latarjet procedure is an effective shoulder stabilizing surgery, however, the procedure results in an alteration of anatomy that may result in shoulder and elbow weakness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess post-operative shoulder and elbow strength after the Latarjet procedure. We hypothesized that shoulder and elbow strength are not affected after the procedure. Methods The study group consisted of patients that had undergone the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. An isokinetic dynamometer was used to evaluate the strength of bilateral shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm supination using peak torque (N/m), as well as grip strength (kilograms). Shoulder range of motion and the potential effects of hand dominance were further analysed. Results Nineteen patients with a mean age of 29 years and an average follow up of 47 months were included. Shoulder internal rotation strength, elbow flexion and forearm supination strength and grip strength were not significantly different when compared to the non-operative side ( p > 0.13). The range of shoulder external rotation was significantly reduced ( p < 0.001) on the Latarjet side. Conclusion The results from this study demonstrate no statistically significant differences in the strength of shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm supination or grip strength despite the surgical alterations to the subscapularis and conjoint tendon.
“…6 However, Ernstbrunner et al reported reduced strength in internal and external rotation of the shoulder after open Latarjet surgery. 7 In a sample of 20 patients, Malavolta et al similarly evaluated shoulder and elbow strength after open Latarjet surgery, however, they reported reduced strength of external rotation and forearm supination, findings that differ from ours. 8 In a sample of 20 patients undergoing open Latarjet surgery, Lacheta et al reported reduced forearm supination strength but did not affect elbow flexion at a mean follow up of 9.8 months.…”
Section: Caubere Et Al Described a Series Of 20 Patients After Opencontrasting
Background The Latarjet procedure is an effective shoulder stabilizing surgery, however, the procedure results in an alteration of anatomy that may result in shoulder and elbow weakness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess post-operative shoulder and elbow strength after the Latarjet procedure. We hypothesized that shoulder and elbow strength are not affected after the procedure. Methods The study group consisted of patients that had undergone the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. An isokinetic dynamometer was used to evaluate the strength of bilateral shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm supination using peak torque (N/m), as well as grip strength (kilograms). Shoulder range of motion and the potential effects of hand dominance were further analysed. Results Nineteen patients with a mean age of 29 years and an average follow up of 47 months were included. Shoulder internal rotation strength, elbow flexion and forearm supination strength and grip strength were not significantly different when compared to the non-operative side ( p > 0.13). The range of shoulder external rotation was significantly reduced ( p < 0.001) on the Latarjet side. Conclusion The results from this study demonstrate no statistically significant differences in the strength of shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm supination or grip strength despite the surgical alterations to the subscapularis and conjoint tendon.
“…43 A simulated Latarjet procedure was then performed in these 2 different bone loss conditions under the 3 humeral head configurations. The distal 25 mm of the coracoid process was cut and transferred to the anteroinferior region of the glenoid 22,49 so that the bone graft was flush with the glenoid bone (mediolateral direction) and approximately 75% of the graft surface was below the glenoid equator of the inferior two-thirds of the glenoid height (craniocaudal direction). 42 Then, two 4.5-mm cortical screws separated by 10 mm were positioned at an angle of 10°to the glenoid plane 10 to secure the graft to the glenoid neck.…”
Background: Glenohumeral joint contact loading before and after glenoid bone grafting for recurrent anterior instability remains poorly understood. Purpose: To develop a computational model to evaluate the influence of glenoid bone loss and graft positioning on graft and cartilage contact pressures after the Latarjet procedure. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A finite element model of the shoulder was developed using kinematics, muscle and glenohumeral joint loading of 6 male participants. Muscle and joint forces at 90° of abduction and external rotation were calculated and employed in simulations of the native shoulder, as well as the shoulder with a Bankart lesion, 10% and 25% glenoid bone loss, and after the Latarjet procedure. Results: A Bankart lesion as well as glenoid bone loss of 10% and 25% significantly increased glenoid and humeral cartilage contact pressures compared with the native shoulder ( P < .05). The Latarjet procedure did not significantly increase glenoid cartilage contact pressure. With 25% glenoid bone loss, the Latarjet procedure with a graft flush with the glenoid and the humerus positioned at the glenoid half-width resulted in significantly increased humeral cartilage contact pressure compared with that preoperatively ( P = .023). Under the same condition, medializing the graft by 1 mm resulted in humeral cartilage contact pressure comparable with that preoperatively ( P = .097). Graft lateralization by 1 mm resulted in significantly increased humeral cartilage contact pressure in both glenoid bone loss conditions ( P < .05). Conclusion: This modeling study showed that labral damage and greater glenoid bone loss significantly increased glenoid and humeral cartilage contact pressures in the shoulder. The Latarjet procedure may mitigate this to an extent, although glenoid and humeral contact loading was sensitive to graft placement. Clinical Relevance: The Latarjet procedure with a correctly positioned graft should not lead to increased glenohumeral joint contact loading. The present study suggests that lateral graft overhang should be avoided, and in the situation of large glenoid bone defects, slight medialization (ie, 1 mm) of the graft may help to mitigate glenohumeral joint contact overloading.
“…It provides a triple blocking effect to increase anterior shoulder stability, and this has been well described in the literature. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Although the indications vary from surgeon to surgeon, we typically consider Latarjet for high-risk patients for recurrent instability who have any glenoid bone loss or low-risk patients who have between 15% and 30% anterior glenoid bone loss. 3,7 For those lower risk patients with \15% glenoid bone loss, we typically perform an Surgical Techniques arthroscopic stabilization procedure.…”
Section: Video Transcriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides a triple blocking effect to increase anterior shoulder stability, and this has been well described in the literature. 1-6…”
Background: The Latarjet procedure is effective for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability with substantial glenoid bone loss due to its triple blocking effect. Indications: Indications include high-risk patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with any glenoid bone loss or low-risk patients with 15% to 30% glenoid bone loss. Technique Description: An incision is made lateral to the coracoid and the deltopectoral interval is established. The pectoralis minor is released medially off the coracoid and the coracoacromial (CA) ligament is released close to the acromion. The coracoid is cut with a right-angle saw and the inferior coracoid is decorticated with a burr. Two holes are pre-drilled in the coracoid. The subscapularis is split between the upper two-thirds and lower one-third with the arm in external rotation. The capsule is split vertically at the joint line and the humeral head is retracted. The anterior glenoid is decorticated with a burr, and a hole is drilled inferiorly. The depth is measured and added to the depth of the inferior bone block hole. A fully threaded 3.5-mm solid stainless steel screw is placed in the inferior hole. Care is taken to ensure that the lateral border of the bone block is flush with the articular margin. This is repeated for the superior hole. A 1.8-mm knotless suture anchor is placed between the screws. The repair stitch is passed through the capsule and loaded onto the anchor and tensioned. The CA ligament is laid over the capsule and repaired. The subscapularis split is repaired side to side and the wound is closed in layers. Results: High return-to-sport rates, including at the same level of play, have been observed among young competitive athletes with significant glenoid bone loss who underwent a Latarjet, with similarly favorable results in older patients. Ninety-day complication rates have been reported around 9%, 5% of which constituted graft or hardware failures. Discussion/Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure is an effective option for indicated patients with anterior glenohumeral instability and may be enhanced with solid screws, proper anatomic technique, and capsulolabral repair augmentation. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.