2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary motor cortex crucial for action prediction: A tDCS study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we applied a tDCS protocol similar to that described by Paracampo et al (2018). Our findings are somewhat comparable to those reported in their paper, in the sense that cathodal stimulation over M1, compared with sham, has indeed modulated the way that our overweight participants perceived and simulated the viewed actions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, we applied a tDCS protocol similar to that described by Paracampo et al (2018). Our findings are somewhat comparable to those reported in their paper, in the sense that cathodal stimulation over M1, compared with sham, has indeed modulated the way that our overweight participants perceived and simulated the viewed actions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More recently, however, a series of neurophysiological studies has revealed a modulation of neuronal activity in M1 during action observation, similar to that of action execution, thus leading researchers to propose that M1 could be considered part of an extended AON (Naish, Houston-Price, Bremner, & Holmes, 2014;Valchev et al, 2015;Vigneswaran, Philipp, Lemon, & Kraskov, 2013). In a more recent study, Paracampo et al (2018) have shown that cathodal tDCS over M1 impaired the participants' accuracy in an action prediction task, but only when the observed actions were performed by humans compared with nonhumans. Thus, they provided seminal causal evidence of the critical role of M1 in action simulation and prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, a study by Schubotz and co-workers [38] showed that sequential presentations of biological (i.e., action) and non-biological abstract stimuli (i.e., circles) share the recruitment of premotor regions, while triggering distinctive patterns of activations in other fronto-parietal areas. In a similar vein, a more recent study by Paracampo and co-workers [39] asked participants to predict the outcome of hand or shape movements and found that, in spite of comparable difficulty, only the first task was affected by interferential stimulation of the left primary motor cortex. In both of these studies, moving shapes were used as control stimuli for assessing the action-specific or the domain general brain involvement in predictive mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%