1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-4453(94)90842-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary meningococcal conjunctivitis and the need for prophylaxis in close contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PMC is classically described as an acute or hyperacute purulent conjunctivitis that is accompanied by gross purulent exudate. The acute onset of unilateral purulent conjunctivitis in our patient was similar to that in most of the cases previously reported [1–4,7,8].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…PMC is classically described as an acute or hyperacute purulent conjunctivitis that is accompanied by gross purulent exudate. The acute onset of unilateral purulent conjunctivitis in our patient was similar to that in most of the cases previously reported [1–4,7,8].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…[2][3][4] Topical therapy alone is not sufficient to treat potential nasopharyngeal carriage, and the risk of developing invasive meningococcal disease is approximately 19 times greater for those receiving topical treatment alone compared to those also receiving systemic antibiotic treatment. 2 However, there is little published literature reporting on potential sources of PMC infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines do not recommend chemoprophylaxis of close contacts if the patient has no evidence of a sterile site infection, 28 although some experts recommend chemoprophylaxis of close contacts of patients with meningococcal conjunctivitis. 29 Despite variations in guidelines, data do not support widespread antibiotic chemoprophylaxis beyond close patient contacts (as described earlier) and this practice should be limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%