2011
DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.78417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary malignancy of seminal vesicle: A rare entity

Abstract: We report a rare case of seminal vesicle malignancy (primitive neuro ectodermal tumor) in a 40-year-old male patient. He was treated with enbloc resection of the tumor and ureteric reimplantation. In view of the rarity of this entity, management of these tumors should be individualized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ifosfamide and etoposide may be added. The optimal combination of chemotherapeutic drugs is still debated and should be individualized [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ifosfamide and etoposide may be added. The optimal combination of chemotherapeutic drugs is still debated and should be individualized [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1956, Dalgaard and Giertson [2] established the following criteria for a diagnosis of SVC: 1) The tumor should be a microscopically verified carcinoma, localized exclusively or mainly in the seminal vesicle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these primary malignant tumors, only couple of cases of PNET of seminal vesicle have been reported so far in the literature. [ 4 5 ] Lower urinary tract symptoms especially hematospermia point to possible seminal vesicle pathology. It is also important to differentiate between primary tumor and a secondary metastatic spread to seminal vesicles, as the former is a localized disease with possibility of cure, while the latter is usually an advanced disease with dismal prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are very few cases reported worldwide, approximately fewer than 100 cases ( 86 ). Etiology of this pathology is unclear, but patients present symptoms of obstructive uropathy, hematuria, and hematospermia ( 87 - 89 ). Diagnosis of ASVs is difficult, as they are negative for prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific acid phosphatase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunophenotype of ASVs are positive for cancer antigen 125 and 7 ( 55 ). Primary diagnostic steps include, DRE identifies as a mass, which requires further examination, and TRUS and biopsy ( 89 , 90 ). MRI, CT with contrast, after histopathology, determine the mass as SVs adenocarcinoma .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%