Primary lower limb joint replacement and tranexamic acid: an observational cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundThis work aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of routine tranexamic acid (TXA) use in elective orthopaedic lower limb joint replacement surgery.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included all primary hip or knee replacement procedures by a single surgeon over a 6-year period. TXA was introduced during the study period as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery strategy.ResultsOf the 673 procedures, 446 cases (66.3%) received TXA. The median length of stay was 5 days (2-69) and 6 days (3-28) for the TXA and control groups, respectively (P < .001). Blood transfusion was required for 28 (6.3%) of the TXA cases versus 40 (17.6%) controls (P < .001). Complication rates were similar irrespective of TXA status. At multivariate analysis, TXA was significantly and independently associated with fewer blood transfusions (hazard ratio 0.309, 95% confidence interval: 0.168-0.568, P < .001), with a number needed to treat of 9 cases. TXA use was estimated to save between £67.89 and £155.90 per case.ConclusionsRoutine prophylactic TXA administration for elective primary hip and knee replacement reduces the likelihood of postoperative transfusion with a number needed to treat of 9. Cost savings may be as high as £155.90 per case, and no safety concerns were noted.

Key Components, Current Practice and Clinical Outcomes of ERAS Programs in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review

“…Paradoxically, in their analysis 90 days after hip and knee arthroplasty, Jørgensen et al found that fall-related hospital readmissions were due to physical activity and extrinsic factors other than surgery because of patient success and intent to return to a normal level of activity [ 24 ]. As emerged from all of the studies examined in this review, in turn, all of these interventions reduce the LOS as patients could be discharged sooner without increasing the risk of complications (References [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , …”

“…Designation of positive, neutral and negative outcome for each examined study. (References [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 ...…”