2013
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.13122869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Esophageal Cancer: Heterogeneity as Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Patients Treated with Definitive Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ganeshan et al found that lower histogram uniformity (with Gaussian filtration) from unenhanced CT images before start of treatment was an independent predictor for poorer overall-survival [36].Yip et al analyzed contrast-enhanced images of 36 patients before and after treatment and found a significant decrease in histogram entropy and increase in uniformity (with Gaussian filtration) between the two time points. Higher post treatment entropy was associated with poorer overall-survival [37]. For gastric cancer (Table 4), three studies have assessed the potential of radiomic approaches for classification.…”
Section: Ct Radiomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganeshan et al found that lower histogram uniformity (with Gaussian filtration) from unenhanced CT images before start of treatment was an independent predictor for poorer overall-survival [36].Yip et al analyzed contrast-enhanced images of 36 patients before and after treatment and found a significant decrease in histogram entropy and increase in uniformity (with Gaussian filtration) between the two time points. Higher post treatment entropy was associated with poorer overall-survival [37]. For gastric cancer (Table 4), three studies have assessed the potential of radiomic approaches for classification.…”
Section: Ct Radiomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regions of interest (ROIs) enclosing the largest cross-sectional area of tumour area were manually delineated on the axial images under the supervision of a gastrointestinal radiologist (AA) with 7 years' experience. The ROIs underwent TA under the supervision of an imaging scientist (BG) with 9 years' experience in TA using proprietary commercially available TEXRAD RESEARCH software (version 3.3, TexRAD Ltd, www.texrad.com, part of Feedback Plc, Cambridge, UK) [26]. MRTA comprised an image filtration-histogram approach where the filtration step employed a Laplacian of Gaussian band-pass spatial scale filter (SSF) to highlight features ranging from SSF = 2 mm (fine) to SSF = 6 mm (coarse) in radius with SSF = 3-5 mm in radius corresponding to medium texture scales ( Fig.…”
Section: Mr Textural Analysis (Mrta)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors performed texture analysis on CT images using in-house software, which has now became commercially available by the name of TexRAD (Tex-RAD Ltd, Cambridge, UK), and a number of studies using this software have been published. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The group suggested the use of five LoG filters ranging from fine to coarse textures (filter widths: fine 5 4 image pixels and coarse 5 12 image pixels) and quantifying tumour heterogeneity by measuring the mean, SD, skewness, mean value of positive pixels (MPP), uniformity and entropy from the CT slice with the largest cross section of the tumour. The group reported uniformity, which is inversely proportional to entropy, to show the most significant results in predicting patient survival.…”
Section: Texture Analysis In Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%