1980
DOI: 10.1021/ja00543a062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary electron acceptors in plant photosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggestion is supported by observations reported on the electron acceptor A1 in photosystern I of higher plants, which is thought to be a monomeric or dimeric Chl a, and which might correspond to X~ in P. aestuarii. In photosystem I particles in which the iron-sulfur center A2 was reduced,g-values of 2.0033 [19] and 2.004 [12] have been reported for A i-. However, in photosystem I preparations which did not contain A2, the g-value of A[ [20] resembled that of Chl a-in vitro [21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggestion is supported by observations reported on the electron acceptor A1 in photosystern I of higher plants, which is thought to be a monomeric or dimeric Chl a, and which might correspond to X~ in P. aestuarii. In photosystem I particles in which the iron-sulfur center A2 was reduced,g-values of 2.0033 [19] and 2.004 [12] have been reported for A i-. However, in photosystem I preparations which did not contain A2, the g-value of A[ [20] resembled that of Chl a-in vitro [21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggest that A4t can be used to estimate the relative growth rates of nitrogen-deficient algae. It has been shown that variable fluorescence is a result of a charge recombination between P680+ and Phaeo-when QA is reduced (8,19) P680' Phaeo-QA-P680* Phaeo QA-, followed by radiative deactivation of P680* within the pigment bed (15,16,18). Thus, changes in At., reflect a change in the fraction of PSII traps which can perform photochemistry, and imply changes in photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency in PSII (2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proposed that this signal arose from a reduced monomeric chlorophyll electron carrier and obtained kinetic evidence for a flash induced EPR transient decaying in the p time range corresponding to this component [7]. Support for the identification of the component as a monomeric chlorophyll came from ENDOR experiments [8]. A spin-polarised triplet EPR signal has also been detected in photosystem I [9]; using LDS-treated particles which lacked the iron-sulphur centres, it was shown that reduction of the chlorophyll intermediary carrier decreased the amplitude of the triplet signal [lo].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%