2019
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary drug resistance in extra-pulmonary tuberculosis: a hospital-based prospective study from Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to our findings, a study reported from India indicated a high proportion (38.2%) of pre-XDR-TB among MDR-TB patients [39]. However, a lower proportion was reported in a similar study conducted in Pakistan [40]. This difference most probably occurred due to treatment failure and MDR-TB burden in the study areas, treatment non-adherence, quality of the drug used, and, TB program-related issues.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…to our findings, a study reported from India indicated a high proportion (38.2%) of pre-XDR-TB among MDR-TB patients [39]. However, a lower proportion was reported in a similar study conducted in Pakistan [40]. This difference most probably occurred due to treatment failure and MDR-TB burden in the study areas, treatment non-adherence, quality of the drug used, and, TB program-related issues.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However prevalence estimates in children can also be argued as not being a true representative of childhood TB population as most likely specimens from sicker children having access to specialized TB care and diagnostic facilities were tested. Among RMP sensitive new EPTB patient (n = 1058), INH resistance of 6.8% (95%CI; 5.4-8.5) was significantly lower compared to PTB (P < .001) in same study population but was consistent with primary drug resistance (5.6%, 95CI; 2.7-10.0) reported in EPTB [19] and PTB in Pakistan [14,20,24]. Most of the EPTB patients in contrast to PTB, were referred for diagnosis of TB and only a few had history of previous TB treatment (<10%), with possibility of these estimates being a true reflection of RsHr in EPTB at population level.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Annual trend for INH resistance was analyzed for years with DST results available by both methods for more than 100 patients. For FQ resistance, all strains reported resistant to OFX (2015-17), LFX (2018- 19) or showing FQ conferring mutations on LPA were considered LFX resistant. Results were compared with the prevalence estimates of resistance reported in DRS [14] and primary drug resistance in EPTB [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Our findings and their implications in terms of a modified testing algorithm probably apply to many other settings in which the classic Xpert assay continues to be used for early diagnosis and active casefinding strategies, as per WHO recommendations. 28 Moreover, the higher risk of false rifampicin resistance with Xpert testing on samples with a low bacillary load is also important for children 29 and people with extrapulmonary tuberculosis, 30 who generally present with paucibacillary tuberculosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%