2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<389::aid-cncr21>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary cytoreductive surgery with rectosigmoid colon resection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
41
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(31 reference statements)
10
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, as far as we are aware, this is the first publication from a recognised UK Gynaecological Oncology Centre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, as far as we are aware, this is the first publication from a recognised UK Gynaecological Oncology Centre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of patients with advanced OC (FIGO stage III/IV), who are treated with systemic, platinum-based chemotherapy, the completeness of the surgery is one of the most relevant positive prognosis factors (74,(112)(113)(114)(115)(116)(117). (Level I evidence).…”
Section: Topic 7: Is It Right From An Ethical Point Of View To Subjecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Einsenkop in 1991 published the block resection of rectosigmoid with uterus, pelvic peritoneum or not, over the elevator muscles of anus promoting the modified posterior exenteration denomination. Subsequently published several experiences reflecting the frequency, safety, efficacy and the low rate of complications of the procedure [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . Revaux in 2012 compared morbidity and survival of the modified posterior exenteration during primary surgery or interval, showing a survival improvement when MPE was performed during the first surgery (49.4 vs 27.1 months) with no differences in digestive complications or no digestive [30] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%