1988
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90782-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary coronary artery dissection observed at coronary angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The left anterior descending coronary artery is most often involved (80% of patients) with the majority of dissections happening, as in our case, in the proximal part, beginning within 2cm of the ostium.1),4) The left main stem has been involved in the dissection in eighteen cases,3) and left and right coronary artery involvement has been reported in 4 patients.6),10),22), 21) The pathogenesis remains unclear but two theories have been suggested3):1) the dissection is caused by hemorrhage from the vasa vasorum into the outer media of the coronary artery, and 2) cystic medial necrosis has been reported in 25 patients with primary coronary dissection although some studies deny its presence.14), 24) The decision to bypass a dissecting coronary artery, including the left main, should be based on the degree of stenosis and the symptoms of the patient, although the report by Zelinger et al25) of a case of left main dissection that progressed to a major occlusion requiring coronary bypass supports the need for close long-term follow-up of patients treated with medication, It has been postulated3) that because most patients with primary dissection are young, internal mammary grafts may be preferred because of their higher patency rates.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 51%
“…The left anterior descending coronary artery is most often involved (80% of patients) with the majority of dissections happening, as in our case, in the proximal part, beginning within 2cm of the ostium.1),4) The left main stem has been involved in the dissection in eighteen cases,3) and left and right coronary artery involvement has been reported in 4 patients.6),10),22), 21) The pathogenesis remains unclear but two theories have been suggested3):1) the dissection is caused by hemorrhage from the vasa vasorum into the outer media of the coronary artery, and 2) cystic medial necrosis has been reported in 25 patients with primary coronary dissection although some studies deny its presence.14), 24) The decision to bypass a dissecting coronary artery, including the left main, should be based on the degree of stenosis and the symptoms of the patient, although the report by Zelinger et al25) of a case of left main dissection that progressed to a major occlusion requiring coronary bypass supports the need for close long-term follow-up of patients treated with medication, It has been postulated3) that because most patients with primary dissection are young, internal mammary grafts may be preferred because of their higher patency rates.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 51%
“…Common coronary artery disease can be expressed as coronary dissection. Some authors [7,8] have suggested a correlation between coronary vasospasm and SCAD but a systematic study on the relationship between them has not been done. Mark et al [7] reported a 50-year-old female, who had ST elevation in the inferior leads on chest pain that was relieved with nitrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors of those studies did not analyze the cause of SCAD. Although a few authors [7,8] have suggested a relationship between coronary vasospasm and SCAD, a systematic study on this correlation is lacking. Only 2 cases of vasospasm during angiography have been reported [7,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) SCAD can also present with unstable angina, MI, or in rare instances, can be asymptomatic and detected incidentally on coronary angiography. 4)16) The incidence of SCAD is 0.1-0.3%, as based on various angiographic series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%