2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008574.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds within 24 hours post injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cochrane group has examined this issue, feels more research is necessary, and has made no consensus statements regarding traumatic wounds, which present within 24 hours of injury. 11…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cochrane group has examined this issue, feels more research is necessary, and has made no consensus statements regarding traumatic wounds, which present within 24 hours of injury. 11…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over a 3-month period the OMFS department assessed and treated 135 lacerations, with the majority treated within the ED with 46% occurring overnight, despite no clinical guidance to say immediate treatment provides a superior result. 2 The remaining cases were operated on within the surgical assessment unit treatment room. No patient received their treatment within the OMFS department itself, despite being equipped for minor operations electively.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 However, a recent Cochrane review yielded no high-quality evidence for or against a so-called 'golden period' for wound closure. 4 Therefore, the age of the wound per se should not inform the decision to primarily close or not, provided certain preparatory steps are undertaken:…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%