2003
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.06.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Chemotherapy in Resectable Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: The addition of primary chemotherapy to standard surgery was unable to improve survival. However, in this study, primary chemotherapy seemed to play a role in reducing the number of patients who needed to undergo mandibulectomy and/or radiation therapy. Variations in the criteria used to select patients for these treatment options may make it difficult to generalize these results, but there appears to be room for using preoperative chemotherapy to spare destructive surgery or radiation therapy in patients with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
148
5
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
148
5
9
Order By: Relevance
“…NAC, which is the use of systemic chemotherapy before definitive surgery and/or radiotherapy, is an attractive approach in the management of HNSCC. The benefits of NAC for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, as demonstrated by several clinical studies, include a reduction in distant metastasis and the preservation of organ function (48-51); however, NAC has failed to demonstrate any significant improvement of survival in several randomized control trials (49,50). The efficacy of NAC is controversial, and no report supports NAC with a high evidence level.…”
Section: Local Recurrence -------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NAC, which is the use of systemic chemotherapy before definitive surgery and/or radiotherapy, is an attractive approach in the management of HNSCC. The benefits of NAC for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, as demonstrated by several clinical studies, include a reduction in distant metastasis and the preservation of organ function (48-51); however, NAC has failed to demonstrate any significant improvement of survival in several randomized control trials (49,50). The efficacy of NAC is controversial, and no report supports NAC with a high evidence level.…”
Section: Local Recurrence -------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the era of taxane, induction treatment did not confer a survival benefit despite its high response (8,9). However, the present result with including docetaxel in the regime offers an advantage over standard PF for the toxicity and convenience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the standard treatment for oral cancer remains surgery alone, with radiotherapy or concomitant chemoradiotherapy subsequent to surgery recommended for high-risk cases (32), as pre-operative chemotherapy has failed to significantly improve the OS rate in certain previous randomized controlled trials (33,34). In addition, Yanamoto et al hypothesized that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase the risk of local recurrence and lead to poor outcomes in OSCC patients (35).…”
Section: Histopathological Response N ------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%