2008
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary central nervous system lymphoma: The role of consolidation treatment after a complete response to high‐dose methotrexate‐based chemotherapy

Abstract: BACKGROUND.The most effective treatment for a new diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma is high‐dose methotrexate (MTX)‐based chemotherapy followed by whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, this combined modality treatment carries an increased risk of delayed neurotoxicity. For patients who achieve a complete response (CR) after induction that uses high‐dose MTX‐based chemotherapy, it is not clear if consolidation treatment is necessary. Therefore, a retrospective study was conducted to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, clear differences between the treatment groups were evident in year 2 after randomization. The higher rates of cognitive dysfunction observed with early WBRT are consistent with previous non-randomized observational studies showing a high rate of cognitive deficits and/or impaired QoL after HD-MTX followed by WBRT (Correa et al 2004;Harder et al 2004;Herrlinger et al 2005;Correa et al 2012;Ekenel et al 2008), while neither QoL impairment nor neuropsychological deficits were found in 21 longterm survivors treated with chemotherapy alone (Juergens et al 2010). Also, a non-randomized analysis of cognitive functioning and QoL in PCNSL long-term survivors treated with our without WBRT suggests that the addition of WBRT increases the risk of neurotoxicity (Doolittle et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, clear differences between the treatment groups were evident in year 2 after randomization. The higher rates of cognitive dysfunction observed with early WBRT are consistent with previous non-randomized observational studies showing a high rate of cognitive deficits and/or impaired QoL after HD-MTX followed by WBRT (Correa et al 2004;Harder et al 2004;Herrlinger et al 2005;Correa et al 2012;Ekenel et al 2008), while neither QoL impairment nor neuropsychological deficits were found in 21 longterm survivors treated with chemotherapy alone (Juergens et al 2010). Also, a non-randomized analysis of cognitive functioning and QoL in PCNSL long-term survivors treated with our without WBRT suggests that the addition of WBRT increases the risk of neurotoxicity (Doolittle et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, a growing inclination to avoid radiotherapy in patients achieving complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy has been applied also to PCNSL. 11 This choice is strongly motivated by the previously mentioned association between WBRT and risk of severe neurotoxicity. 5 However, WBRT withdrawal should be considered with caution as the situation is completely different in PCNSL, where the quality of response after chemotherapy is suboptimal compared with DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP).…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two multicenter retrospective analyses no differences were noted regarding disease-free survival or OS times between patients in CR receiving WBRT as consolidation treatment and those receiving WBRT at the time of relapse [68,69]. In the MSKCC experience, consolidation treatment with WBRT produced a longer failure-free survival time but not OS time in CR patients after MTX-based therapy and produced higher rates of neurotoxicity [70].…”
Section: Treatment Of Newly Diagnosed Pcnslmentioning
confidence: 99%