2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1164-6_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Cell Cultures of Regenerating Holothurian Tissues

Abstract: The ability to culture different cell types is essential for answering many questions in developmental and regenerative biology. Studies in marine organisms, in particular echinoderms, have been limited by the lack of well-described cellular culture systems. Here we describe a cell culture system, for normal or regenerating holothurian cells, that allows cell characterization by immunohistochemistry and scanning electron microscopy. These cell cultures can now be used to perform multiple types of experiments i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the morphology of living cells, which compared well with previous studies (e.g., Endean, 1958;Hetzel, 1963), comparison of our data with other studies is difficult because of differences in methods. Although other studies of coelomocytes in Holothuroidea have also analyzed morphometrics (Prompoon et al, 2015;Ramírez-G omez et al, 2010) and cell morphology of stained (D'Ancona & Canicattì, 1990;Prompoon et al, 2015;Ramírez-G omez et al, 2010) and SEM (Xing et al, 2008;Bello et al, 2015) preparations, these studies commonly use smeared cells instead cytocentrifugation. Taking into account that coelomocyte morphology, and consequently morphometry, may be affected by biotic or abiotic factors in smeared preparations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for the morphology of living cells, which compared well with previous studies (e.g., Endean, 1958;Hetzel, 1963), comparison of our data with other studies is difficult because of differences in methods. Although other studies of coelomocytes in Holothuroidea have also analyzed morphometrics (Prompoon et al, 2015;Ramírez-G omez et al, 2010) and cell morphology of stained (D'Ancona & Canicattì, 1990;Prompoon et al, 2015;Ramírez-G omez et al, 2010) and SEM (Xing et al, 2008;Bello et al, 2015) preparations, these studies commonly use smeared cells instead cytocentrifugation. Taking into account that coelomocyte morphology, and consequently morphometry, may be affected by biotic or abiotic factors in smeared preparations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, two or more methods were used together (Canicattì et al, 1989b;Xing et al, 2008), which certainly improves the analysis. By contrast, data from other methods such as cytochemistry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) have hardly ever been used to study coelomocyte morphology (Bello et al, 2015;D'Ancona & Canicattì, 1990). The use of morphometry in studies of coelomocytes in Holothuroidea is even scarcer, though it has been proven informative in studies of hemocytes in other invertebrates, including Mollusca and Arthropoda (Salimi et al, 2009;Silva et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle tissues were obtained following the dissection protocol described by Bello, SA, et al 2015 [ 76 ], with some modifications. Briefly, animals were anesthetized by placing them on ice for 1 h, then washed with 10% sodium hypochlorite, ethanol 70% respectively for one minute, and left in purified/autoclaved sea water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eluted cell suspension was washed three times for 10 min each time under centrifugation (900 × g , 10 min, 4°C) in Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ‐free artificial seawater solution with neomycin (10 mg/ml, N8090; Solarbio, Beijing, China) and amphotericin B (2.5 mg/ml, A8250; Solarbio, Beijing, China). The cell pellets were resuspended in a modified Leibovitz 15 medium (GNAM1300; Genom, Hangzhou, China) supplemented with human IGF‐1 (100 μg/ml), human FGF‐basic (0.1 μg/μL), vitamin E (1.75 mg/L), insulin (5 mg/L), and gentamycin (40 mg/L) at 1–10 × 10 6 cells in 1.5‐ml closed polyethylene tubes (Bello, Abreu‐Irizarry, & García‐Arrarás, ; with cells primary culture of regenerated intestinal tissue in vitro). For stress induction, cells after stabilization at 15°C for half an hour were immediately heated at 25°C for 4 hr in a metal bath reactor as an acute heat stress stimulus, whereas other cells were kept at 15°C to serve as the control group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%