Primary care team and its association with quality of care for people with multimorbidity: a systematic review

Abstract

Background Multimorbidity is posing an enormous burden to health systems, especially for primary healthcare system. While primary care teams (PCTs) are believed to have potentials to improve quality of primary health care (PHC), less is known about their impact on the quality of care for people with multimorbidity. We assessed the characteristics of PCTs and their impact on the quality of care for people with multimorbidity and the mechanisms. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ProQuest for published studies from January 2000 to October 2021 for studies in English. Following through PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers independently abstracted data and reconciled by consensus with a third reviewer. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were evaluated to identify relevant studies. Studies were categorized by types of interventions, the impact of interventions on outcome measures, and mechanisms of interventions. Results Seventeen studies (13 RCT, 3 cohort studies, and 1 non-randomized trial) were identified. PCTs were summarized into three types—upward PCTs, downward PCTs and traditional PCTs according to the skill mix. The upward PCTs included primary care workers and specialists from upper-level hospitals, downward PCTs involving primary care workers and lay health workers, and traditional PCTs involving physicians and care managers. PCTs improved patients’ mental and psychological health outcomes greatly, and also improved patients’ perceptions towards care including satisfaction with care, sense of improvement, and patient-centeredness. PCTs also improved the process of care and changed providers’ behaviors. However, PCTs showed mixed effects on clinical outcome measures. Conclusions PCTs have improved mental and psychological health outcomes, the process of care, patients’ care experiences, and satisfaction towards care for patients with multimorbidity. The effect of PCTs on clinical outcomes and changes in patient behaviors need to be further explored.

Team Effectiveness in General Practice: Insights from the Norwegian Primary Healthcare Team Pilot

“…However, despite variations in the organizational context, the informants at P1, P2, P3, and P4 agreed that functional teamwork produced good and relevant results, primarily for the patients as well as Team Effectiveness in General Practice: Insights from the Norwegian Primary Healthcare Team… DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004545 largely for themselves as it increased their job satisfaction. These results are in line with findings in other studies [4,15,34,40]. The stories told by the informants at P1 and P2 indicate an increase over time in their ability to collaborate.…”

Regular source of primary care and health services utilisation among Brazilian elderly with mental-physical multimorbidity

“…Often, these patients are being managed in a highly fragmented manner, with each healthcare professional focused on a single pathology and, therefore, these patients are subjected to a greater number of negative outcomes [ 13 ]. As results of a systematic review [ 42 ], a wide range of healthcare components were found to have the potential to improve services: individual care plans, thorough geriatric assessments, and the application of shared decision-making [ 37 , 43 , 44 ]. Here, the priority for health systems is to deliver people-centred primary care services.…”

Primærhelseteam – en mer teambasert fastlegetjeneste

“…Som vist i forsøket, kan teamarbeid også bidra til økt arbeidstilfredshet. Dette er i tråd med funn fra internasjonal litteratur (Li et al, 2023;O'Malley et al, 2015;Weller et al, 2014;Schmutz et al, 2019). Dersom team arbeid kan gjøre arbeid i den kommunale helse-og omsorgstjenesten mer attraktivt og redusere utskifting av ansatte, kan dette bidra til å styrke tjenesten fremover.…”