Primary Care Physicians' Adherence to Expert Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention in the Context of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination

Abstract

Background Expert recommendations do not recommend using Pap or human papillomavirus (HPV) test results to determine whether unvaccinated females should receive HPV vaccine, nor do they recommend using vaccine receipt to inform cervical cancer screening practices. This study characterizes physicians’ HPV vaccine recommendations and practices in the context of HPV and Pap testing. Methods We surveyed family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists randomly selected from the American Medical Association Masterfile in 2011 (n = 574). Physicians used a 5-point scale (never to always) to report the frequency of (1) using HPV testing results to decide whether to recommend HPV vaccine, and (2) recommending HPV vaccination to females (≤26 years) who had an abnormal Pap test. Physicians also reported (3) intention to change Pap screening frequency for vaccinated females. Results Across both specialties, 80% correctly reported rarely or never using HPV testing results to guide vaccine recommendations; 66% often or always recommended vaccination to patients with an abnormal Pap result; and 77% did not plan to change Pap screening frequency for vaccinated females. About 41% reported recommendation-consistent practices with all three measures. In multivariable analysis, obstetrician-gynecologist specialty and private practice type were associated with higher average overall adherence to recommendations. Conclusions Contrary to expert recommendations, a considerable minority of physicians reported recommending HPV vaccination based on HPV and Pap test results. If these clinical practices persist, many young adult women will not realize the benefits of HPV vaccination. Additional efforts are needed to ensure all young women are screened and vaccinated appropriately.

MicroRNA‑143 regulates cell migration and invasion by targeting GOLM1 in cervical cancer

“…Due to delayed initial screening, the lack of early diagnosis and the unavailable widespread screening by cervical cytology ( 2 ), cervical cancer mainly occurs in developing countries and causes approximately 265,000 deaths every year worldwide ( 3 ). In addition, approximately 85% of new cervical cancer cases occur in lower socioeconomic countries ( 4 ). Emerging studies indicate that risk factors, such as infection of high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), promiscuity and early sexual intercourse, have essential effects on cervical cancer progression ( 5 ).…”

Practice patterns for chronic hypoparathyroidism: data from patients and physicians in France

“…Discrepancies could exist between perceived and actual adherence to guidelines, as reported earlier by family medicine practitioners ( 20 ). Most previous surveys were based on the physician’s perspective and reported answers via recollection of their own habits ( 15 , 21 , 22 , 23 ); this could be affected by recall bias. Here, we took advantage of collecting data from two sources (physicians and patients): being asked about what one usually does implies an answer either on average or by archetype.…”

Effectiveness of a health education program to improve health literacy among females in their 20s: A quasi-experimental study

“…A study on the relationship between HL and adherence to the recommendation to undergo breast cancer screening among Japanese women reported that breast and/or cervical cancer screening behavior is related to receiving a recommendation from a doctor and with having a primary care physician [29]. A study of primary care physicians' adherence to expert recommendations for cervical cancer reported that the specialty of obstetrician-gynecologist was associated with higher average adherence to cancer screening recommendations [30]. However, this is partly due to the lack of a general primary physician system in Japan.…”