Primary care nurses’ experiences of how the mass media influence frontline healthcare in the UK

Abstract

BackgroundMass media plays an important role in communicating about health research and services to patients, and in shaping public perceptions and decisions about health. Healthcare professionals also play an important role in providing patients with credible, evidence-based and up-to-date information on a wide range of health issues. This study aims to explore primary care nurses’ experiences of how mass media influences frontline healthcare.MethodsIn-depth telephone interviews were carried out with 18 primary care nurses (nine health visitors and nine practice nurses) working in the United Kingdom (UK). Interviews were recorded and transcribed. The data was analysed using thematic analysis, with a focus on constant comparative analysis.ResultsThree themes emerged from the data. First, participants reported that their patients were frequently influenced by controversial health stories reported in the media, which affected their perceptions of, and decisions about, care. This, in turn, impinged upon participants’ workloads as they had to spend additional time discussing information and reassuring patients. Second, participants also recalled times in their own careers when media reports had contributed to a decline in their confidence in current healthcare practices and treatments. Third, the participants in this study suggested a real need for additional resources to support and expand their own media literacy skills, which could be shared with patients.ConclusionIn an ever expanding media landscape with greater reporting on health, nurses working in the primary care setting face increasing pressure to effectively manage media stories that dispute current health policies and practices. These primary care nurses were keen to expand their media literacy skills to develop critical autonomy in relation to all media, and to facilitate more meaningful conversations with their patients about their health concerns and choices.

Knowledge of Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors among a Community Sample in Oman: Pilot study

“…29 Among the cohort in the current study, the level of knowledge regarding age as a risk factor for CHD was close to the cut-off point designating adequate knowledge, reflecting a limited understanding of age as a non-modifiable risk factor for CHD. Furthermore, while the majority of the participants knew that being overweight increased the risk of CHD, fewer realised that carrying higher levels of abdominal fat imposes the greatest risk.…”

Readability of Ebola Information on Websites of Public Health Agencies, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Europe

“…The continued modification of procedures also demands constant public engagement efforts to avoid dissemination of conflicting messages and to ensure that information released is up to date and presented at a level that can be adequately understood. Because there have been limited national communication campaigns in non–EVD-affected countries, it is likely that other outlets, including traditional mass media and social media, might have been used by the public to meet their information needs ( 13 ), with probable trade-offs between immediacy and accuracy or reliability of information provided. The variation of readability identified in our study suggests that with contributions from health literacy specialists, public health agencies could further adapt the EVD information provided.…”

The Association Between Internet Use and Ambulatory Care-Seeking Behaviors in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Another study reported that the controversial health-related information reported in the media might affect patients’ perceptions of and decision making about medical care [27]. In addition, several studies have shown that health-related information on the Internet is less likely to be accredited by the Health on the Net Foundation, and is therefore less reliable [28].…”

“…As a result, patients who spend more time using the Internet may be more likely to visit outpatient clinics for clarification and interpretation of a kaleidoscope of health-related information. This, therefore, may increase physicians’ workloads, as they have to spend additional time discussing health-related information and reassuring patients [27]. …”