Abstract:Extended-release (ER) opioid analgesics are associated with prolonged analgesia and greater stability in pain relief compared with immediate-release formulations. Due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of ER opioids and additional clinical advantages, the use of ER opioids for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic noncancer pain has increased. Primary care physicians are the major prescribers of opioids and require an in-depth understanding of the risks and benefits of opioid treatment in pain mana… Show more
“…Compared with IR opioid formulations, ER opioid formulations are more appropriate to achieve optimal pain control for patients with chronic persistent pain requiring around-the-clock analgesia [ 2 ]. The quality of ER formulations can be partially evaluated by assessing the three cebranopadol PK parameters, t max , HVD and PTF, highlighted above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opioids represent effective analgesics with a broad spectrum and are used in acute and chronic pain conditions [ 1 ]. In clinical practice, extended-release (ER) opioids are used more often for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic pain in noncancer patients [ 2 ]. Despite the clinical benefits of these strong analgesics that act via μ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonism, concerns have been expressed about the safety of long-term opioid administration.…”
Background and ObjectivesCebranopadol is a novel first-in-class analgesic acting as a nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonist with central analgesic activity. It is currently in clinical development for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. This trial focuses on the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of cebranopadol after oral single- and multiple-dose administration.MethodsThe basic PK properties of cebranopadol were assessed by means of noncompartmental methods in six phase I clinical trials in healthy subjects and patients. A population PK analysis included two further phase I and six phase II clinical trials.ResultsAfter oral administration of the immediate-release (IR) formulation, cebranopadol is characterized by a late time to reach maximum plasma concentration [C
max] (4–6 h), a long half-value duration [HVD] (14–15 h), and a terminal phase half-life in the range of 62–96 h. After multiple once-daily dosing in patients, an operational half-life (the dosing interval resulting in an accumulation factor [AF] of 2) of 24 h was found to be the relevant factor to describe the multiple-dose PKs of cebranopadol. The time to reach steady state was approximately 2 weeks, the AF was approximately 2, and peak-trough fluctuation (PTF) was low (70–80%). Dose proportionality at steady state was shown for a broad dose range of cebranopadol 200–1600 µg. A two-compartment disposition model with two lagged transition compartments and a first-order elimination process best describes cebranopadol data in healthy subjects and patients after single- and multiple-dose administration.ConclusionsCebranopadol formulated as an IR product can be used as a once-daily formulation; it reaches C
max after only 4–6 h, and has a long HVD and a low PTF. Therefore, from a PK perspective, cebranopadol is an attractive treatment option for patients with chronic pain.
“…Compared with IR opioid formulations, ER opioid formulations are more appropriate to achieve optimal pain control for patients with chronic persistent pain requiring around-the-clock analgesia [ 2 ]. The quality of ER formulations can be partially evaluated by assessing the three cebranopadol PK parameters, t max , HVD and PTF, highlighted above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opioids represent effective analgesics with a broad spectrum and are used in acute and chronic pain conditions [ 1 ]. In clinical practice, extended-release (ER) opioids are used more often for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic pain in noncancer patients [ 2 ]. Despite the clinical benefits of these strong analgesics that act via μ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonism, concerns have been expressed about the safety of long-term opioid administration.…”
Background and ObjectivesCebranopadol is a novel first-in-class analgesic acting as a nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonist with central analgesic activity. It is currently in clinical development for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. This trial focuses on the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of cebranopadol after oral single- and multiple-dose administration.MethodsThe basic PK properties of cebranopadol were assessed by means of noncompartmental methods in six phase I clinical trials in healthy subjects and patients. A population PK analysis included two further phase I and six phase II clinical trials.ResultsAfter oral administration of the immediate-release (IR) formulation, cebranopadol is characterized by a late time to reach maximum plasma concentration [C
max] (4–6 h), a long half-value duration [HVD] (14–15 h), and a terminal phase half-life in the range of 62–96 h. After multiple once-daily dosing in patients, an operational half-life (the dosing interval resulting in an accumulation factor [AF] of 2) of 24 h was found to be the relevant factor to describe the multiple-dose PKs of cebranopadol. The time to reach steady state was approximately 2 weeks, the AF was approximately 2, and peak-trough fluctuation (PTF) was low (70–80%). Dose proportionality at steady state was shown for a broad dose range of cebranopadol 200–1600 µg. A two-compartment disposition model with two lagged transition compartments and a first-order elimination process best describes cebranopadol data in healthy subjects and patients after single- and multiple-dose administration.ConclusionsCebranopadol formulated as an IR product can be used as a once-daily formulation; it reaches C
max after only 4–6 h, and has a long HVD and a low PTF. Therefore, from a PK perspective, cebranopadol is an attractive treatment option for patients with chronic pain.
“…ER opioid formulations are considered more suitable for appropriate management of pain in chronic patients. Oral intake of ER medicinal products produces higher plasmatic concentrations and lower peak-to-trough changes over the dosing interval, in comparison with IR products ( Gudin, 2013 ; Nicholson, 2013 ). The first formulation having, according to FDA, abuse-deterrent characteristics contained only hydrocodone bitartrate was a once-daily hydrocodone bitartrate ER product, prescribed for the long-term opioid treatment of severe pain refractory to other analgesic strategies ( Dhillon, 2016 ).…”
Section: Hydrocodone In the Medicinal Productsmentioning
Hydrocodone is one of the most prescribed oral analgesic drugs and it is one of the most abused drugs in general population. It is a mu-opioid agonist predominantly metabolized to the O-demethylated product hydromorphone and to the N-demethylated product norhydrocodone. The purpose of the study is to summarize the preclinical and clinical characteristics of hydrocodone. Pharmacokinetic aspect (terminal half-life, maximum serum concentration, and time to maximum serum concentration) of hydrocodone and the influence of metabolic genetic polymorphism in analgesic response to hydrocodone are also illustrated and commented. Literature on experimental preclinical pharmacology investigating analgesic activity in laboratory animals is furtherly discussed. Moreover, the authors discuss and comment on the updated data regarding safety profile and effectiveness of hydrocodone in the treatment of chronic pain. A bibliographic research was carried out (from February 01, 2018 to August 28, 2018) independently by two researchers (blinded to the authors and initially on results) in the major scientific databases and research engines of peer-reviewed literature on life sciences and biomedical topics, starting from January 1990 to August 2018. Analysis of results of clinical studies suggests that abuse-deterrent extended-release (ER) hydrocodone formulations can be effective and they are well tolerated in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Weaker is the evidence of the analgesic effectiveness of ER hydrocodone on other chronic pain syndromes and non-cancer non-neuropathic chronic pain. In these conditions, hydrocodone showed to have positive effects in non-controlled open studies and needs to be further studied to assess the real strength of results.
“…Blood samples to determine hydrocodone plasma concentrations were collected from each subject during each of the treatment periods at the following time points: predose and at 0.5, 1, 2. 5,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,24,30,36,48, and 72 hours postdose.…”
Section: Study Designs Dose-proportionality Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review articles have found that, compared with IR formulations, oral ER products produce more consistent plasma concentrations and lower peak-to-trough fluctuations over the dosing interval. 7,8 Additionally, the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of ER products have been found to provide sustained pain relief, with less frequent dosing, reduced pill burden, and more stable clinical effects. [7][8][9] Furthermore, a singleentity ER hydrocodone product may reduce the risks associated with the nonopioid components of the IR products, permitting a higher total daily hydrocodone dose in appropriate patients in whom the benefit/risk balance justifies such a regimen.…”
Once-daily HYD exhibits linear, dose-proportional PK properties and is associated with a lower variability in plasma hydrocodone concentrations when compared with an immediate-release hydrocodone combination product. Notably, analgesia provided by HYD is sustained during the 24-hour dosing interval. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01400139 (Study 4).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.