2023
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary cardiac sarcomas: A clinicopathologic study in a single institution with 25 years of experience with an emphasis on MDM2 expression and adjuvant therapy for prognosis

Abstract: BackgroundPrimary cardiac sarcomas are rare and their clinicopathologic features are heterogeneous. Among them, particularly intimal sarcoma is a diagnostic challenge due to nonspecific histologic features. Recently, MDM2 amplification reported to be a characteristic genetic event in the intimal sarcoma. In this study, we aimed to identify the types and incidence of primary cardiac sarcomas that occurred over 25 years in tertiary medical institutions, and to find clinicopatholgical significance through reclass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of similar tumors in the heart remains difficult due to the lack of diagnostic consensus among soft tissue pathologists, and the diagnosis of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma versus IS is currently debatable due to the extreme similarities in their biological behaviors. However, based on the cases that have been reported and the related reports, the diagnosis of IS is preferred when the following two basic criteria are met: ① occurrence within the lumen of a large blood vessel in the pulmonary or systemic circulation or within the lumen of the heart; and ② a primary high-grade sarcoma, with or without an anisotropic component ( 9 ). Moreover, histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations are important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of similar tumors in the heart remains difficult due to the lack of diagnostic consensus among soft tissue pathologists, and the diagnosis of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma versus IS is currently debatable due to the extreme similarities in their biological behaviors. However, based on the cases that have been reported and the related reports, the diagnosis of IS is preferred when the following two basic criteria are met: ① occurrence within the lumen of a large blood vessel in the pulmonary or systemic circulation or within the lumen of the heart; and ② a primary high-grade sarcoma, with or without an anisotropic component ( 9 ). Moreover, histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations are important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%