2013
DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.107542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary balloon angioplasty for symptomatic, high-grade intracranial stenosis

Abstract: Background:In light of recent controversy about the safety and efficacy of intracranial stenting, we sought to evaluate our experience with primary balloon angioplasty for symptomatic, high-grade intracranial stenosis.Methods:All intracranial angioplasty cases performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 2006 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed for degree of stenosis pre- and post-procedure. Immediate peri-procedural complications were evaluated as well as one-month and long-term outcomes.Results:A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2) Twenty-six of primary angioplasty patients treated between 2006 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. 3) The stenosis rate improved from 71.2% to 46.6%, and retreatment was required for only 3.8% of these patients. The 30-day stroke or death rate of 11.5% in this balloon angioplasty series was higher than that in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS but was lower in the stenting arm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 2) Twenty-six of primary angioplasty patients treated between 2006 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. 3) The stenosis rate improved from 71.2% to 46.6%, and retreatment was required for only 3.8% of these patients. The 30-day stroke or death rate of 11.5% in this balloon angioplasty series was higher than that in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS but was lower in the stenting arm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Recently, some reports reappraised primary angioplasty without stenting for intracranial stenosis. 2 , 3) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%