Magnetic resonance imaging of the torn anterior lateral ligament (ALL) is inconsistent and subject to significant intra-and interobserver variability. Like that of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), an ALL tear can vary in degree (first, second, or third) and location (tibial or femoral side). These variations may impact the appropriate surgical intervention. Relevant biomechanical data indicate that the deep iliotibial band fibers are more important than the ALL in controlling pivot shift. Lateral compartment overconstraint after ALL reconstruction does not appear to be a biomechanical or clinical issue. An ALL reconstruction creates a nonisometric construct (tight in extension and lax in flexion), allowing physiologic internal tibial rotation at 90 flexion, whereas lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is more isometric, limiting physiologic internal tibial rotation at 90 flexion. The indications for a combined ACL/ALL reconstruction are evolving, but a Segond fracture and ligamentous hyperlaxity of 5 using the modified Beighton system seem reasonable. An ACL/LET reconstruction results in better stability for patients with high-grade pivot shifts.