1998
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
170
5
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
9
170
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, effects on size were strongly sex biased, with females doing worse than males when their mothers were reared in large experimental broods. The findings are consistent with previous evidence that female nestlings are more vulnerable to nutritional stress (Bradbury & Blakey 1998;Kilner 1998;Martins 2004;Rutstein et al 2004) and show that such effects can even last into the next generation (also see Gorman & Nager 2004). Since females raised in enlarged broods produce eggs with lower testosterone levels , it may be that our present findings were mediated through this mechanism, together with a possibly differential effect of yolk androgen in male and female embryos (Gil 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly, effects on size were strongly sex biased, with females doing worse than males when their mothers were reared in large experimental broods. The findings are consistent with previous evidence that female nestlings are more vulnerable to nutritional stress (Bradbury & Blakey 1998;Kilner 1998;Martins 2004;Rutstein et al 2004) and show that such effects can even last into the next generation (also see Gorman & Nager 2004). Since females raised in enlarged broods produce eggs with lower testosterone levels , it may be that our present findings were mediated through this mechanism, together with a possibly differential effect of yolk androgen in male and female embryos (Gil 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Given the higher mortality rates in female zebra finches under harsh environmental conditions (Bradbury and Blakey 1998;de Kogel 1997b;Kilner 1998), we suggest that mortality rates were biased towards females with relatively weak immune capacity such that the remaining females mounted higher immune responses, on average (see also Møller and Saino 2004). Alternatively, seeing that immunity is a highly plastic trait that varies sex-specifically and in a context-dependent way (Love et al 2008), resource allocation trade-offs between immunity and other functions may differ between sexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Early developmental conditions can further be expected to differentially affect adult innate immunity in male and female zebra finches, as the latter have been shown to be more negatively affected by harsh rearing conditions (e.g. Bradbury and Blakey 1998;de Kogel 1997b;Kilner 1998;Martins 2004;Verhulst et al 2006), and inflammatory and humoral immune responses have been shown to vary between sexes and contexts (Love et al 2008;McGraw and Ardia 2005). Furthermore, increased foraging costs in adulthood result in physiological adjustments to save energy , and might therefore also affect innate immunity because of the associated energetic costs (Klasing 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential sex allocation has been intensively investigated in model species of songbirds in captivity (notably the zebra finch), where it is easy to experimentally control male physical traits and female conditions. However, evidence for whether or not mothers invest more in sons than daughters under favorable breeding circumstances (e.g., better nutrition or mates) remains controversial especially in the zebra finch (Burley, 1981;Burley, 1986;Kilner, 1998;Rutstein et al, 2004;McGraw et al, 2005;Rutstein et al, 2005b). In addition, laying sequence, which is associated with sibling rivalry resulting from asynchronous hatching, can have confounding effects on differential sex allocation (Rutkowska & Cichoń, 2002;Rutstein et al, 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because female zebra finches are more vulnerable than males during development (De Kogel & Prijs, 1996;Kilner, 1998), female offspring are more costly. Hence it can be adaptive for mothers to produce the less costly sex (males) under some unfavorable reproductive situations, and vice versa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%