Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement Using the Robodoc?? System

Bargar, William L.; Bauer, André; Börner, M.

doi:10.1097/00003086-199809000-00011

Cited by 378 publications

(246 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

222

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…With the use of robotic system, the intraoperative fractures are rare (Bargar et al, 1998;Jerosch et al, 1999;Paul et al, 1992). Bargar et al reported the result of one ongoing study in the USA, which included 134 hips (69 of robotic system and 65 of control).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Advantages of the robotic system with regard to precise planning and accuracy of the intraoperative procedure had been shown in a study by Honl et al(2003), although there was higher complication rate in the robotic-operated group compared to the conventional one. An additional operation is needed for pin placement for robotic operation, and the operation time is longer than that of conventional operation (Honl et al, 2003;Bargar et al, 1998). Bargar et al (1998) reported the surgical time and blood loss were significantly greater for patients in the robotic system group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An additional operation is needed for pin placement for robotic operation, and the operation time is longer than that of conventional operation (Honl et al, 2003;Bargar et al, 1998). Bargar et al (1998) reported the surgical time and blood loss were significantly greater for patients in the robotic system group. Analysis of the increased surgical time for patients in the robotic group showed that intrinsic delays such as application of the fixation, docking, pin finding, and milling.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty

Hahne

Hassenpflug

2004

J. Zheijang Univ.-Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Objective: To observe the accuracy of femoral preparation and the position of the cementless prosthesis in femoral cavity, and to compare the results between the computer-assisted surgical group (CASPAR) and the conventional group. Methods: Ten femoral components were implanted either manually or by CASPAR in cadaver femurs. The specimens were cut to 3 mm thick slices. Microradiograms of every slice were sent to a computer for analysis with special software (IDL). The gaps and the medullary cavities between component and bone, the direct bone contact area of the implant surface, the gap width and the percentage of gap and bone contact area were measured in every slice. Results: In the proximal implant coated with HA of the CASPAR group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 93.2% (ranging from 87.6% to 99.7%); the average gap percentage was 2.9% (ranging from 0.3% to 7.8%); the maximum gap width was 0.81 mm and the average gap width was only 0.20 mm. While in the conventional group, the average percentage of bone contact reached 60.1% (ranging from 49.2% to 70.4%); the average gap percentage was 32.8% (ranging from 25.1% to 39.9%); the maximum gap width was 2.97 mm and the average gap width was 0.77 mm. The average gap around the implant in the CASPAR group was only 9% of that in the manual group; the maximum and average gap widths were only about 26% of those in the manual group. On the other hand, the CASPAR group showed 33% higher bone contact than the manual group. Conclusion: With the use of robotics-assisted system, significant progress can be achieved for femoral preparation in total hip arthroplasty.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty

Hahne

Hassenpflug

2004

J. Zheijang Univ.-Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CT images are transferred into PC-based planning software. Virtual implants are placed in the CT images, and a robot reams the femoral canal, according to the preoperative planning (Bargar et al 1998, Nogler et al 2001.…”

Section: Patients and Robotic-assisted Thrmentioning

confidence: 99%

The internal calcar septum and its contact with the virtual stem in THRA computer tomographic evaluation

Decking¹,

Decking²,

Schoellner³

et al. 2003

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The robotic arms work in a similar way to laparoscopic instruments used in abdominal surgery but are more intuitive, and the EndoWrist® (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) instruments allow seven degrees of motion, which is ideal for minimally invasive complex surgery in confined areas. For this reason the system has been established in numerous surgical specialties and recently has been developed for the resection of tumors in the oropharynx without the need for mandibulotomy by transoral robotic surgery (TORS) [32][33][34][35][36].…”

Section: Robotic Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Cutting Edge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Hegab¹

2015

J Oral Hyg Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vision for the future with advanced technology and science for easy and better treatments outcome motivating the clinicians to look-forward to practical the cutting edge tactics in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The results will be providing the patients with first-class medical services with reduction of the treatment morbidity. Greater progress has been made in the field of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In the last decades, the researchers were concentered on the improvement of the preoperative planning as it plays a vital role in the success rate of the surgical procedures. Now, as a result of the advanced computer technology, the researches extend beyond the scope of planning and moving toward the surgical procedures itself.Evolution over the last decades focused toward improvement of the preoperative planning, minimally invasive approaches, and minimizing the operation time. All aiming to decrease surgical complications and less post-operative pain and rapid return to normal life-style activities. As a result; remarkable recent advances in surgical and computer technology are evolving every day. Innovations in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery have allowed the professions to progress at a very fast rate and looked-for for more every day. The increased accuracy and speed of treatment, along with reduced discomfort, and decreased the complications will be the actual advantages to our patients.The aim of the current review is to give an insight about the cutting edge in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery to provide a more detailed physical manifestation of your mental picture and a new dimension of insight into the clinical situations you encounter every day.

show abstract

Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement Using the Robodoc?? System

Cited by 378 publications

References 6 publications

The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty

The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty

The internal calcar septum and its contact with the virtual stem in THRA computer tomographic evaluation

The Cutting Edge in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About