2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary and Revision Cervical Disc Arthroplasty from 2010–2020: Patient Demographics, Utilization Trends, and Health Care Reimbursements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CDR utilization (an increase of 413% from 2010 to 2020) and revision (an increase of 141% from 2010 to 2020) have shown a high rate of annual growth in the United States, while CDR revision rates demonstrate a declining trend and compare favorably with ACDF. 28 Estimated rate of revision surgery after CDR ranges from 1% to 15% dependent on the study and follow-up time. 23,[29][30][31] Skovrlj et al 30 reports that from a total of 1068 cervical arthroplasty levels operated on with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 2-4 y), the established mean rate of reoperation (laminoforaminotomy, laminectomy, and/or posterior fusion ) is 1.0% (range, 0%-3.1%), revision (adjusting or modifying original implant) at 0.2% (range, 0%-0.5%), and removal (often followed by ACDF) at 1.2% (range, 0%-1.9%).…”
Section: Utilization Of Pcf For Persistent/ Recurrent Symptoms After Cdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CDR utilization (an increase of 413% from 2010 to 2020) and revision (an increase of 141% from 2010 to 2020) have shown a high rate of annual growth in the United States, while CDR revision rates demonstrate a declining trend and compare favorably with ACDF. 28 Estimated rate of revision surgery after CDR ranges from 1% to 15% dependent on the study and follow-up time. 23,[29][30][31] Skovrlj et al 30 reports that from a total of 1068 cervical arthroplasty levels operated on with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 2-4 y), the established mean rate of reoperation (laminoforaminotomy, laminectomy, and/or posterior fusion ) is 1.0% (range, 0%-3.1%), revision (adjusting or modifying original implant) at 0.2% (range, 0%-0.5%), and removal (often followed by ACDF) at 1.2% (range, 0%-1.9%).…”
Section: Utilization Of Pcf For Persistent/ Recurrent Symptoms After Cdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDR utilization (an increase of 413% from 2010 to 2020) and revision (an increase of 141% from 2010 to 2020) have shown a high rate of annual growth in the United States, while CDR revision rates demonstrate a declining trend and compare favorably with ACDF 28 . Estimated rate of revision surgery after CDR ranges from 1% to 15% dependent on the study and follow-up time 23,29–31 .…”
Section: Utilization Of Pcf For Persistent/recurrent Symptoms After Cdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Length of stay was also significantly higher (1.37 vs 3.30 d, P < 0.001) in the revision group. 11 In a 2021 systematic review, a 5-year index-level revision rate of 3.9% (n = 170) for CDA was reported, with a small percentage of these undergoing multiple revisions (n = 9). 14 The most common secondary procedures were ACDF (68%) and posterior cervical fusion (15.5%).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the early 2000s, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has gained significant momentum, with the ability to address stenosis while preserving the range of motion 4,5 . The acceptance and use of these devices have increased significantly over the past decade 6 . With the increased adoption of CDA, there has been a significant expansion of device options in the market, designed with a variety of materials, articulations, and geometries 7,8 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 The acceptance and use of these devices have increased significantly over the past decade. 6 With the increased adoption of CDA, there has been a significant expansion of device options in the market, designed with a variety of materials, articulations, and geometries. 7,8 WHAT WE KNOW…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%