2016
DOI: 10.5958/0974-0228.2016.00045.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary and cationic micronutrient status of soils in few districts of eastern Uttar Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details are presented in Table 3. The overall nutrient index of the district was in conformity with the findings of Singh et al, 2016 [19]. In view of the above, it is concluded that the intensive soil management practices are required in the studied area for improvement of crop productivity and soil health.…”
Section: Nutrient Index Percent Distribution and Mapping Of The Studsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The details are presented in Table 3. The overall nutrient index of the district was in conformity with the findings of Singh et al, 2016 [19]. In view of the above, it is concluded that the intensive soil management practices are required in the studied area for improvement of crop productivity and soil health.…”
Section: Nutrient Index Percent Distribution and Mapping Of The Studsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…8% and 2 % respectively. Similar result was observed by Singh et al(2016) in the soil of Sevapuri block of Varanasi of Uttar Pradesh. The map indicates that most of the vegetable growing areas were in neutral to alkaline pH.…”
Section: Soil Fertility Statussupporting
confidence: 87%
“…On other side, amount of nutrients added, reaction time in soil, rate of extraction by roots, nature and amount of clay minerals, micronutrient content are the governing factors could have responded well with transformation of zinc in soils. (Jat, et al, 2014, Subehia, et al, 2011, Mishra et al,2019, Gupta et al, 2018, Kumar et al, 2017, Saad et al, 2017, Singh et al, 2016 Available manganese (mg kg -1 )…”
Section: Available Sulphur (Kg Ha -1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These treatments are statistically at par with the treatment (T 18 ) i.e., 5.01 mg kg -1 during2018 and 5.64 mg kg -1 during 2019 respectively. (Longchamp et al, 2016, Gyanendra et al, 2015, Singh et al, 2016 In conclusion the present investigation, it was apparent that application of N and P fertilizer in treatment T 19 [140:80:50 NPK kg ha -1 + Zn (20 kg ha -1 ) + Mn (25 kg ha -1 ) + Azotobacter (200 ml ha -1 )+ PSB (200 ml ha -1 )] was found on physical and chemical parameters of soil such as bulk density, particle density, % pore space, water holding capacity, Soil texture, Soil colour, EC, pH, organic carbon, available NPKS and available micronutrient ( Zn, Mn) than other treatment combinations. %pore space, pH and EC are non-significant.…”
Section: Available Sulphur (Kg Ha -1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%