The Rat Nervous System 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374245-2.00005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Afferent Projections to the Spinal Cord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SDH receives glutamatergic inputs from C fibers and Aδ fibers of the dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord glutamatergic interneurons [43], and brain stem reticular formation [30], and a D2R agonist inhibits these inputs [30,44]. Similar to these studies, we observed that D2R agonists significantly inhibited the sEPSC frequency in the SDH neurons, and the effect was much stronger in the 6-OHDA-lesioned mice than in the saline control mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The SDH receives glutamatergic inputs from C fibers and Aδ fibers of the dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord glutamatergic interneurons [43], and brain stem reticular formation [30], and a D2R agonist inhibits these inputs [30,44]. Similar to these studies, we observed that D2R agonists significantly inhibited the sEPSC frequency in the SDH neurons, and the effect was much stronger in the 6-OHDA-lesioned mice than in the saline control mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Large diameter, Type I or Type II afferents could also have been excited. 29 Considering that muscle contractions were completely abolished after administration of pancuronium, it is quite unlikely that direct depolarization of the muscle fibers contributed in any significant degree to contractions induced by electrical stimuli used in the present study. Blocking the contraction, in the presence of electrical stimulation, significantly reduced the neuronal response to electrical stimulation, suggesting that direct stimulation of primary afferents was not the major contributor to the increased DHN response during contractions.…”
Section: Dhn Responses To Muscle Contractionmentioning
confidence: 68%