1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1984.tb05687.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Affective Disorder, Drug Abuse, and Neuropsychological Impairment in Sober Alcoholics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Somewhat more probable explanations for the failure to find an association between depression and cognitive impairment include differences between our study and previous studies in the types of cognitive outcome measures used, the manner in which depression was conceptualized and assessed, and the types of comparison groups employed. The present findings do, however, replicate previous studies demonstrating nonsignificant associations between depression and cognitive functioning among psychiatric (Braff, Glick & Griffin, 1983) and co-morbid psychiatric and substance-abusing patients (Clark et al, 1984;Hasin & Grant, 1987). The fact that each of the aforementioned studies employed the SILS and BDI as indicators of cognitive impairment and depression, respectively, suggests that further research is needed to ascertain the utility of these measures for assessing the association between affect and cognitive/neuropsychological performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Somewhat more probable explanations for the failure to find an association between depression and cognitive impairment include differences between our study and previous studies in the types of cognitive outcome measures used, the manner in which depression was conceptualized and assessed, and the types of comparison groups employed. The present findings do, however, replicate previous studies demonstrating nonsignificant associations between depression and cognitive functioning among psychiatric (Braff, Glick & Griffin, 1983) and co-morbid psychiatric and substance-abusing patients (Clark et al, 1984;Hasin & Grant, 1987). The fact that each of the aforementioned studies employed the SILS and BDI as indicators of cognitive impairment and depression, respectively, suggests that further research is needed to ascertain the utility of these measures for assessing the association between affect and cognitive/neuropsychological performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Diagnoses were made by applying DSM-I11 criteria retrospectively to chart material collected largely in the several years immediately preceding DSM-ID. The frequency of affective disorders in Finlayson's series is higher than that reported for nonalcoholic elderly persons in the community (Regier et al, 1988), but well within the range of rates reported in younger recently admitted alcoholic inpatients (8-56%) (Cadoret & Winokur, 1972;Clark, Pisani, Aagesen, Sellers, & Fawcett, 1984;Keeler, Taylor, & Miller, 1979;Woodruff, Guze, Clayton, & Carr 1973).…”
Section: Associated Featuressupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Individuals with deficits were told that re-training was often possible and suitable protocols would be integrated into group and individual treatment approaches. It was also emphasised that the longer an individual remains abstinent from alcohol and/or drugs, the • greater the possibility of regaining lost cognitive functioning, and, therefore, improving scores on re-test (Clark, Pisani & Aagesen, 1984;Mueser et al, 1992). The number and severity of impairment in the younger members was an unexpected finding in this study and suggests greater disruption of social and occupational functioning (along with implications for benefit and need of treatment) (Henry & Coster, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%