1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0046719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primacy effects in personality impression formation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
94
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
9
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants rated their performance as best when questions were ordered from the easiest to the hardest relative to when questions were randomized. This pattern of data suggests that performance evaluations made at the end of a test are susceptible to memory-based distortions, and conceptually replicates the primacy effects found in impression formation (Anderson & Barrios, 1961): The run of easy questions at the start of the block created a more positive impression of the experience and led to higher estimates of performance without an analogous improvement in actual performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Participants rated their performance as best when questions were ordered from the easiest to the hardest relative to when questions were randomized. This pattern of data suggests that performance evaluations made at the end of a test are susceptible to memory-based distortions, and conceptually replicates the primacy effects found in impression formation (Anderson & Barrios, 1961): The run of easy questions at the start of the block created a more positive impression of the experience and led to higher estimates of performance without an analogous improvement in actual performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, in Experiment 3 we demonstrated that this effect did not seem to be driven by an increase in item-by-item confidence or a decreased ability to distinguish between correct and incorrect responses. In other words, the effect appears to be a result of a retrospective memory bias, more specifically, a primacy bias, as demonstrated in impression formation research (Anderson & Barrios, 1961) and unlike the recency effect demonstrated with respect to hedonic experiences (Kahneman et al, 1997). This outcome makes sense, given that our procedure is closer in nature to the procedure of impression formation than to that of ongoing experience, because it involves discrete verbal events as opposed to a fluid experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Asch, 1946;Anderson, 1965;Anderson & Barrios, 1961;Forgas, 2011). In the context of person perception, if traits are presented in serial order, the traits that were presented first would thus have a greater influence on the overall impression of the target person than traits that were presented later.…”
Section: Dynamic Changes In Emotional Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%