2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.2006.00289.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing Swaptions and Coupon Bond Options in Affine Term Structure Models

Abstract: We propose an approach to find an approximate price of a swaption in affine term structure models. Our approach is based on the derivation of approximate swap rate dynamics in which the volatility of the forward swap rate is itself an affine function of the factors. Hence, we remain in the affine framework and well-known results on transforms and transform inversion can be used to obtain swaption prices in similar fashion to zero bond options (i.e., caplets). The method can easily be generalized to price optio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(106 reference statements)
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not the case for the exponential affine or quadratic class. Researchers often resort to different dynamics specifications for pricing caps and floors, which are essentially options on zero-coupon bond, than for pricing swaptions; or one must resort to linear approximations to retain tractability (Heidari, Hirsa, and Madan (2007) and Schrager and Pelsser (2006)). By starting with a linearity-generating process, we remove the need for linear approximation on the pricing relation and circumvent the concern on internal consistency when different dynamics or different approximations are used to price different contracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not the case for the exponential affine or quadratic class. Researchers often resort to different dynamics specifications for pricing caps and floors, which are essentially options on zero-coupon bond, than for pricing swaptions; or one must resort to linear approximations to retain tractability (Heidari, Hirsa, and Madan (2007) and Schrager and Pelsser (2006)). By starting with a linearity-generating process, we remove the need for linear approximation on the pricing relation and circumvent the concern on internal consistency when different dynamics or different approximations are used to price different contracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Schrager and Pelsser (2006) and Duffie and Singleton (1997) for the 2-factors C.I.R. model 7 diag(σ) means the diagonalization of the vector σ and chol(ρ) means the Cholesky decomposition of the correlation matrix ρ, where σ and ρ are the volatility vector and the correlation matrix, respectively, of the original paper.…”
Section: Vasicek Model Three-factors Gaussian Model and Cox-ingersolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important are those of Munk (1999), Collin- Dufresne and Goldstein (2002), Singleton and Umantsev (2002) and Schrager and Pelsser (2006). Munk approximates the price of an option on a coupon bond by a multiple of the price of an option on a zero-coupon bond with time to maturity equal to the stochastic duration of the coupon bond.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They demonstrated that their approach is accurate compared with Monte Carlo simulation for a three-factor Gaussian model as well as a two-factor square-root model. Schrager and Plesser [2006] investigated the pricing of swaptions within LIBOR market models. They linearized the dynamics of the swap rate under the swap measure ( Jamshidian [1997]) and used the conditional Fourier transform to approximate the swaption price.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%