2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing methods and hedging strategies for volatility derivatives

Abstract: In this paper we investigate the behaviour and hedging of discretely observed volatility derivatives. We begin by comparing the effects of variations in the contract design, such as the differences between specifying log returns or actual returns, taking into consideration the impact of possible jumps in the underlying asset. We then focus on the difficulties associated with hedging these products. Naive delta-hedging strategies are ineffective for hedging volatility derivatives since they require very frequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By exploring a dimension reduction technique, their numerical approach achieves high efficiency and accuracy for discretely-sampled variance swaps. Windcliff et al (2006) also explored a numerical algorithm to evaluate discretely-sampled volatility derivatives using numerical partial-integro differential equation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By exploring a dimension reduction technique, their numerical approach achieves high efficiency and accuracy for discretely-sampled variance swaps. Windcliff et al (2006) also explored a numerical algorithm to evaluate discretely-sampled volatility derivatives using numerical partial-integro differential equation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these two numerical methods evaluate vari-ance swaps based on discretely-sampled realized variance and achieve high accuracy, the major limitation is that their models do not incorporate stochastic volatilities that are the most commonly used to model the dynamics of equity indices. To remedy this drawback, Little and Pant (2001) and Windcliff et al (2006) pointed out, respectively, in the conclusions of their papers that for better pricing and hedging general variance swaps one needs to adopt an appropriate model that incorporates the stochastic volatility characteristics observed in financial markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main tool was the assumption of the local volatility as a known function of time and spot price of the underlying asset. Furthermore, Windcliff et al [109] investigated the effects of employing the partial-integro differential equation on constant volatility, local volatility and jump diffusion-based volatility products using delta-gamma hedging. Large transaction costs involved in constant volatility models may result in inefficiency of their delta-gamma hedging modus.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little and Pant (2001) propose a finite difference method for numerical valuation of discretely sampled variance swaps under the local volatility model. Windcliff et al (2006) develop robust numerical schemes that solve the partial integraldifferential option pricing equation under jump-diffusion asset price dynamics. The high level of path dependence in discretely sampled volatility derivatives is handled by tracking two stochastic state variables that capture the jump of the sampled variance across a monitoring date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%