2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing inertia and Frequency Response with diverse dynamics in a Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming formulation

Abstract: Low levels of system inertia in power grids with significant penetration of non-synchronous Renewable Energy Sources (RES) have increased the risk of frequency instability. The provision of a certain type of ancillary services such as inertia and Frequency Response (FR) is needed at all times, to maintain system frequency within secure limits if the loss of a large power infeed were to occur. In this paper we propose a frequency-secured optimisation framework for the procurement of inertia and FR with diverse … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, energy dispatch is subject to operational constraints, and there are no payments for being constrained on or off. This model is also consistent with the establishment of spot markets for system services, but co-optimized with generator dispatch (Badesa et al, 2020;Pϋschel-Lovengreen and Mancarella, 2018).…”
Section: Dominant Service Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, energy dispatch is subject to operational constraints, and there are no payments for being constrained on or off. This model is also consistent with the establishment of spot markets for system services, but co-optimized with generator dispatch (Badesa et al, 2020;Pϋschel-Lovengreen and Mancarella, 2018).…”
Section: Dominant Service Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Unit commitment creates nonconvexities in dispatch optimization, 13 which makes locational marginal pricing less meaningful. Some designs have adopted linear relaxations of the integer products to obtain meaningful pricing of inertia (Badesa et al, 2020). In other markets, the challenges of revenue inadequacy flowing from centralized unit commitment have relied upon 'uplift and clawback' side-payment frameworks, and upon alternative price formations for energy (such as convex-hull approximations) to minimize those uplift payments (Gribik et al, 2007).…”
Section: Definabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation captures the basic dynamic features of governors and adds a linear ramp rate constraint to the underlying optimization problem. The concept of simplifying dynamic representations of frequency stability has been extended to various other problems, such as Unit Commitment (UC) [45], storage integration [46], wind turbine frequency response [47], stochastic scheduling [48], and inertia and frequency response pricing [49]. However, in the aforementioned coupled reserve and energy formulations, the system dynamics (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the system operating conditions, we evaluated the system frequency response using the methodological approach described in Section II.B. As a result, we obtained that in 1881 of the 8760 operating conditions (21.47%), the occurrence of at least one contingency resulted in a frequency nadir below the UFLSSs threshold defined by the Chilean regulatory framework (49 ). This shows that the power reserves allocation obtained from the UC does not always allow the system to ride through major power imbalances without activation of UFLSSs.…”
Section: Fast Frequency Response Requirements To Ensure System Frequency Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic UC flowchart can be seen in Figure 1. Some authors have incorporated a frequency-secured optimization framework for the procurement of an inertia [33] and frequency response [34], which enables the application of a marginal pricing scheme for these services.…”
Section: Uc With Exogenous Frequency Constraints Buc Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%