2013
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hht015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing Credit Default Swaps with Observable Covariates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We provide a more detailed discussion of equity and asset return Sharpe ratios in the Internet Appendix. 20 These ratios are comparable to what has been reported in Berndt et al (2018), and Doshi et al (2013). 21 The asset volatility value is based on Feldhütter and Schaefer (2018) and the leverage value from Huang and Huang (2012).…”
Section: Variance Risk Premia and Credit Spreads For A Representativesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We provide a more detailed discussion of equity and asset return Sharpe ratios in the Internet Appendix. 20 These ratios are comparable to what has been reported in Berndt et al (2018), and Doshi et al (2013). 21 The asset volatility value is based on Feldhütter and Schaefer (2018) and the leverage value from Huang and Huang (2012).…”
Section: Variance Risk Premia and Credit Spreads For A Representativesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In Doshi et al. (), the intensity is modeled as a quadratic function of the leverage, among other factors. We could obtain a similar intensity process by setting αfalse(ifalse) to 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some might argue that if CDS spreads are nonstationary, then the results employing level CDS spreads may be spurious and differencing the spreads may help alleviate the statistical problems. However, the theoretical underpinnings of CDS spreads are not intrinsically described by processes that display drifts, which would imply nonstationarity (Doshi et al, 2013). Additionally, the impact of the nonstationary series on panel model estimates may not be as central as in pure time-series analysis (Kao, 1999;Phillips and Moon, 1999).…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%