2012
DOI: 10.1002/isaf.336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing and Hedging Short Sterling Options Using Neural Networks

Abstract: SUMMARY This paper compares the performance of artificial neural networks (ANNs) with that of the modified Black model in both pricing and hedging short sterling options. Using high‐frequency data, standard and hybrid ANNs are trained to generate option prices. The hybrid ANN is significantly superior to both the modified Black model and the standard ANN in pricing call and put options. Hedge ratios for hedging short sterling options positions using short sterling futures are produced using the standard and hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ANN based option pricing and hedging in the literature Bennell and Sutcliffe [2004], Chen and Sutcliffe [2012], and Hahn [2013] 1 provide extensive literature surveys on the application of ANNs to option pricing and hedging problems. Here we complement these surveys with additional and more recent papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ANN based option pricing and hedging in the literature Bennell and Sutcliffe [2004], Chen and Sutcliffe [2012], and Hahn [2013] 1 provide extensive literature surveys on the application of ANNs to option pricing and hedging problems. Here we complement these surveys with additional and more recent papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the performance of neural network approximations using R 2 , a measure has been used by other researchers to measure neural network accuracy, as in, e.g., Hattab et al (2013). There are, however, several other options for neural network performance metrics; a few such possibilities include correlation (Chen and Sutcliffe 2012), relative error (Hejazi and Jackson 2016), and mean square prediction error (Garcia and Gençay 2000). We expect that any of these metrics would have yielded substantially the same results.…”
Section: Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pioneers are Malliaris and Salchenberger (1993) and Hutchinson et al (1994), who compared the performance of the BS model and NNs in pricing American-style call options. For a detailed current overview about the range of prior studies, see Chen and Sutcliffe (2012). for out-of-the-money options, the BS performed better.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, subsequent studies mostly investigated daily equity index options data for option pricing approximations. For a detailed current overview about the range of prior studies, see Chen and Sutcliffe (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%