1995
DOI: 10.1080/13504869500000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain volatilities

Abstract: We present a model for pricing and hedging derivative securities and option portfolios in an environment where the volatility is not known precisely, but is assumed instead to lie between two extreme values σminand σmax. These bounds could be inferred from extreme values of the implied volatilities of liquid options, or from high-low peaks in historical stock- or option-implied volatilities. They can be viewed as defining a confidence interval for future volatility values. We show that the extremal non-arbitra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
524
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 558 publications
(532 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(5 reference statements)
5
524
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, in much of the optimal execution literature with ambiguity averse agents, the sources of uncertainty are driven by Brownian motions, Poisson processes, or Poisson random measures, and the agent's candidate models are characterized by a suitable class of equivalent measures ( [41], [42], [44]). Even when candidate models are allowed to be mutually singular, e.g., in the separate body of work on option pricing under volatility uncertainty ( [81], [21]), they are philosophically similar, say, in the sense that they might have the same general form but differ in their parameter specifications. These points heighten the possibility of (i).…”
Section: Background and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, in much of the optimal execution literature with ambiguity averse agents, the sources of uncertainty are driven by Brownian motions, Poisson processes, or Poisson random measures, and the agent's candidate models are characterized by a suitable class of equivalent measures ( [41], [42], [44]). Even when candidate models are allowed to be mutually singular, e.g., in the separate body of work on option pricing under volatility uncertainty ( [81], [21]), they are philosophically similar, say, in the sense that they might have the same general form but differ in their parameter specifications. These points heighten the possibility of (i).…”
Section: Background and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyons, 1995;Avellaneda et al, 1995;Dokuchaev and Savkin, 1998;Lyons and Smith, 1999;Forsyth and Vetzal, 2001). These studies show that pricing in uncertain volatility models involves nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertain volatility model was independently developed by Lyons (1995) and Avellaneda et al (1995). In this case, volatility is assumed to lie within a range of values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, i t w ould be desirable to explore stochastic volatility o r s t o c hastic interest rate models, but this is not feasible given the complexity of the contracts (recall that we are already solving a two or three dimensional problem, and that including the feature of resetting the time until expiry in addition to the strike adds another dimension). An alternative is to consider the use of uncertain parameter models 2,15]. In this context, we specify a range over which a parameter is assumed to vary throughout the life of the contract.…”
Section: Uncertain Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is critical for the institutions o ering such products to be able to hedge the risk exposures involved. 2 There has not been much academic research in this general area. Simple maturity g u a rantees have been explored in 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%