1991
DOI: 10.1017/s008130520001801x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price Transmission in the Catfish Industry with Specific Emphasis on the Role of Processing Cooperatives

Abstract: The paper presents the implications of farmer-owned processing cooperatives for pricing in the catfish industry and tests hypotheses about the nature of price transmission in the catfish industry. The results of the linear feedback model indicate that causal relationships exist between farm and wholesale prices in the catfish industry. The direction of causality for both frozen and processed whole catfish run from farm to wholesale level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade, there have been a number of studies exploring the characteristics of the market for seafood products. These studies have addressed, among other aspects, price integration (Squires et al, 1989), price transmission within the industry (Nyankori, 1991), how the market reacts to uncertainty (Lent, 1984), product substitution and patterns of demand, demographic aspects of demand (Cheng and Capps, 1988), the effect of advertising on retail demand (Brooks and Anderson, 1991;Capps and Lambregts, 1991;Kinnucan and Venkateswaran, 1990) and price flexibility in response to changes in supply (Cooper and Whitmarsh, 1994;Jaffry et al, 1999). Of particular relevance is the work by Wang and Kellogg (1988) and Botsford et al (1986), who have assessed the relationship between product attributes (in these instances, size) and price, and studies which have used variations of self-explicated utility approaches (notably conjoint analysis) to characterise seafood markets, as for salmon in the USA (Anderson and Brooks, 1986;Anderson, 1988) and Japan (Anderson and Kusakabe, 1989) and striped bass in the UK (Wirth et al, 1991).…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, there have been a number of studies exploring the characteristics of the market for seafood products. These studies have addressed, among other aspects, price integration (Squires et al, 1989), price transmission within the industry (Nyankori, 1991), how the market reacts to uncertainty (Lent, 1984), product substitution and patterns of demand, demographic aspects of demand (Cheng and Capps, 1988), the effect of advertising on retail demand (Brooks and Anderson, 1991;Capps and Lambregts, 1991;Kinnucan and Venkateswaran, 1990) and price flexibility in response to changes in supply (Cooper and Whitmarsh, 1994;Jaffry et al, 1999). Of particular relevance is the work by Wang and Kellogg (1988) and Botsford et al (1986), who have assessed the relationship between product attributes (in these instances, size) and price, and studies which have used variations of self-explicated utility approaches (notably conjoint analysis) to characterise seafood markets, as for salmon in the USA (Anderson and Brooks, 1986;Anderson, 1988) and Japan (Anderson and Kusakabe, 1989) and striped bass in the UK (Wirth et al, 1991).…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the assumption of competitive market clearing may be questioned due to industry concentration at the processor level (Kouka, 1995;Nyankori, 1991) and price bargaining at the farm level, it appears that market power is too weak for market prices to deviate significantly from competitive levels for any length of time (Kinnucan, 1995). Although the assumption of competitive market clearing may be questioned due to industry concentration at the processor level (Kouka, 1995;Nyankori, 1991) and price bargaining at the farm level, it appears that market power is too weak for market prices to deviate significantly from competitive levels for any length of time (Kinnucan, 1995).…”
Section: Marginal Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the prices of whole, fillet, and steak shows that the prices of fillets, round weight, and steak are increasing much faster than the price at the farm level. Nyankori (1991) showed that a link price transmission to farmers is less than to processors and market intermediaries. Zidack et al (1992) showed a price transmission of -.68.…”
Section: Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%