2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price negotiation under uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result (See, e.g., Dixit, 1994 for an analysis of this result or Moon et al, 2011 for the detailed proof of this result) is displayed in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Distinctive Characteristics Of Negotiation When Merger Occurmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result (See, e.g., Dixit, 1994 for an analysis of this result or Moon et al, 2011 for the detailed proof of this result) is displayed in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Distinctive Characteristics Of Negotiation When Merger Occurmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Note that the firms in the supply chain face different, but correlated risk. This specification is generalized from the standard setting of one-dimensional geometric Brownian motion which is a good approximation for uncertainties (see, e.g., Dixit, 1989;Pindyck, 1991;Abel and Eberly, 1995;Murto, 2004) and can be used in the field of supply chains (Li and Kouvelis, 1999;Marathe and Ryan, 2005;Caldentey and Wein, 2006;Moon et al, 2011). Let σ 2 i ¼ σ 2 i1 þ σ 2 i2 denote the volatility of firm i's stochastic shock.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wiltermuth and Neale (2011) found that negotiators that had information irrelevant for the negotiation about their negotiation counterpart were more likely to reach an impasse. Uncertainty in revenues and costs can result in a negotiation impasse (Moon, Yao, and Park 2011). For a negotiator, failing to reach an agreement in previous negotiations is likely to lead to an impasse in the negotiator's subsequent negotiations (O'Connor, Arnold and Burris 2005).…”
Section: Gender Negotiation Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%