2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2004.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price limits on a call auction market: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, increase volatility significantly after reaching the limits because it prevents large price changes and immediate corrections. This result is consistent with that of (Lehmannn, 1989;Phylaktis et al, 1999;Kim, 2001;Henke & Voronkova, 2005;Bildik & Gulay, 2006). Second, implementation of daily limits does interfere in trading operations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, increase volatility significantly after reaching the limits because it prevents large price changes and immediate corrections. This result is consistent with that of (Lehmannn, 1989;Phylaktis et al, 1999;Kim, 2001;Henke & Voronkova, 2005;Bildik & Gulay, 2006). Second, implementation of daily limits does interfere in trading operations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2 A secondary reason for studying the KLSE is that we can examine price limit performance within a periodic call market. SeeHenke and Voronkova (2003) for an extreme example of this setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these theoretical arguments are ambiguous, it is not surprising that empirical findings on the effectiveness of the price limit reported in the literature are largely inconclusive. Price continuation has been evidenced by a positive return autocorrelation in the South Korean, Warsaw, Tokyo and Istanbul stock markets (for example, Lee and Chung, 1996;Henke and Voronkova, 2005;Bildik and Gulay, 2006). However, price reversals have also been documented by Huang (1998) for the Taiwan stock exchange and Farag (2015) for the Egyptian market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen, Rui and Wang (2005) also report price reversals after lower price limit hits on the two Chinese stock exchanges. For volatility spillover analysis, the majority of the studies (for example, Chung, 1991;Chen, 1993;Kim and Rhee, 1997;Kim, 2001;Henke and Voronkova, 2005;Li, Zheng and Chen, 2014;Danişoğlu and Güner, 2018) show that stocks exhibit high volatility after price limits hits. However, some exceptions have been reported for the Chinese market (Chen, Rui and Wang, 2005;Kim, Liu and Yang, 2013), South Korean market (Lee and Kim, 1995;Berkman and Lee, 2002) and Japanese market (Deb, Kalev and Marisetty, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation