2022
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey size is more representative than prey taxa when measuring dietary overlap in sympatric forest bats

Abstract: With decreasing habitat availability and quality, considering the needs of multiple species and their interactions is crucial to maximize conservation efforts, particularly for species at risk (e.g., Burgar et al., 2019). Beyond simple habitat associations, preferred prey and their habitats must also be considered in conservation plans for predators (Arrizabalaga-Escudero et al., 2015). Highly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal defoliators in this system are moths (Lepidoptera), beetles (Coleoptera), true bugs (Hemiptera), and katydids and crickets (Orthoptera). The bats that occur in the study area consume all of these groups, taking prey items with wingspans that range from 1.25 to 174 mm (Clare et al, 2009 ; Cravens et al, 2018 ; Divoll et al, 2022 ; Whitaker, 2004 ). The most common large‐bodied moth families in the study area are Erebidae, Noctuidae, Notodontidae, and Geometridae; the most common small‐bodied families are Gelechiidae, Tortricidae, and Gracillariidae (Divoll et al, 2022 ; Summerville et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The principal defoliators in this system are moths (Lepidoptera), beetles (Coleoptera), true bugs (Hemiptera), and katydids and crickets (Orthoptera). The bats that occur in the study area consume all of these groups, taking prey items with wingspans that range from 1.25 to 174 mm (Clare et al, 2009 ; Cravens et al, 2018 ; Divoll et al, 2022 ; Whitaker, 2004 ). The most common large‐bodied moth families in the study area are Erebidae, Noctuidae, Notodontidae, and Geometridae; the most common small‐bodied families are Gelechiidae, Tortricidae, and Gracillariidae (Divoll et al, 2022 ; Summerville et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bats that occur in the study area consume all of these groups, taking prey items with wingspans that range from 1.25 to 174 mm (Clare et al, 2009 ; Cravens et al, 2018 ; Divoll et al, 2022 ; Whitaker, 2004 ). The most common large‐bodied moth families in the study area are Erebidae, Noctuidae, Notodontidae, and Geometridae; the most common small‐bodied families are Gelechiidae, Tortricidae, and Gracillariidae (Divoll et al, 2022 ; Summerville et al, 2013 ). Among other insects, the herbivorous families we most observed in the study area and our plots were beetles (Circulionidae, Chrysomelidae, Cerambycidae, Elateridae, and Scarabaeidae), true bugs (Cicadellidae, Miridae, Pentatomidae), and katydids and crickets (Gryllidae and Tettigoniidae).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, a large portion of their diet was Coleoptera, but we www.nature.com/scientificreports/ found high dietary diversity, including many dipterans, possibly attributed to more dipterans in winter relative to other insect orders 39 . Flexible hunting strategies may allow bat species to adapt to different food availabilities by consuming prey that is abundant at the time, although of non-optimal sizes or other characteristics 51 . In contrast, the diet of L. cinereus, the largest species in our study and one of the largest species in North America, was comprised primarily of Diptera and Lepidoptera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%