2022
DOI: 10.1111/oik.09173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey naiveté alters the balance of consumptive and non‐consumptive predator effects and shapes trophic cascades in freshwater plankton

Abstract: Predators drive trophic cascades by reducing prey biomass and altering prey traits, selecting for prey that exhibit constitutive and induced anti‐predator defenses that decrease susceptibility to consumption. These defense traits are often costly, generating a tradeoff between consumptive (CEs) and non‐consumptive predator effects (NCEs). The ecological and evolutionary experience that prey share with a given predator may determine their position along this tradeoff curve, affecting the nature and strength of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 82 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tadpole densities and body sizes were not significantly different across treatments, and thus density‐ and size‐dependent effects on tadpole–invertebrate competition should have been similar. Also, in invertebrate communities experiencing predation risk, the influence of competition on invertebrate prey traits and population sizes is minimal relative to the influences of CEs and NCEs (Baker et al, 2022), and thus predatory effects of tadpoles likely outweighed influences of tadpole–invertebrate competition. Future studies using purely carnivorous species would be useful in eliminating the confounding influences of competition and predation on invertebrate prey and providing direct comparisons of the relative strengths of CEs and NCEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tadpole densities and body sizes were not significantly different across treatments, and thus density‐ and size‐dependent effects on tadpole–invertebrate competition should have been similar. Also, in invertebrate communities experiencing predation risk, the influence of competition on invertebrate prey traits and population sizes is minimal relative to the influences of CEs and NCEs (Baker et al, 2022), and thus predatory effects of tadpoles likely outweighed influences of tadpole–invertebrate competition. Future studies using purely carnivorous species would be useful in eliminating the confounding influences of competition and predation on invertebrate prey and providing direct comparisons of the relative strengths of CEs and NCEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%