1967
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1967.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey detection by Chaetognatha via a vibration sense

Abstract: Chaetognaths (arrow worms) have two types of tufts along the body, not previously distinguished. The bristles seen in life are non-sensory processes of epithelial cells. The ciliary tufts visible in sections are groups of sensory neurons each of which bears a non-motile cilium at the tip of its dendrite. The high sensitivity to vibrations set up by a nearby oscillating source in the dark is attributed to the non-motile cilia. The example analysed, Spadella cephaloptera , makes an accura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluid signals contain both oscillatory (AC) and unidirectional (DC) components. Previous research has almost exclusively used an oscillating bead to collect behavioral and neurophysiological data from a wide variety of organisms (Horridge & Boulton 1967, Newbury 1972, Tautz 1979, Gassie et al 1993, Lenz & Hartline 1999. Its effects on fluid motion in both the near and far field have been mathematically described (Kalmijn 1988), adding to the relative ease of its use in experimental design.…”
Section: The Fluid Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid signals contain both oscillatory (AC) and unidirectional (DC) components. Previous research has almost exclusively used an oscillating bead to collect behavioral and neurophysiological data from a wide variety of organisms (Horridge & Boulton 1967, Newbury 1972, Tautz 1979, Gassie et al 1993, Lenz & Hartline 1999. Its effects on fluid motion in both the near and far field have been mathematically described (Kalmijn 1988), adding to the relative ease of its use in experimental design.…”
Section: The Fluid Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ability to localize prey using water waves is found in a wide range of aquatic predators including seals, arthropods, frogs, fish, arrow worms and leeches (Bleckmann and Barth, 1984;Dehnhardt et al, 1998;Elepfandt, 1984;Horridge and Boulton, 1967;Kanter and Coombs, 2003;Lang, 1980;Mann, 1962;Russell and Roberts, 1974;Young et al, 1981;Zimmer, 2001). For this information to guide effective prey localization behavior, prey-induced water disturbances must be separated from those arising from other sources (such as wind, rain or predators).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual conspicuousness in prey body size, shape, pigmentation, and motion can all influence the selection by planktivorous fish (O'Brien 1979). Many invertebrate predators, such as Calanoid and cyclopoid copepods, insect larvae, and chaetognaths, use sensory setae to detect the hydrodynamic disturbances produced by the swimming motions of their zooplankton prey (Horridge and Boulton 1967;Strickler andBal1973;Strickler 1975;Kerfoot 1978). Prey selection by mechanosensory invertebrate predators is thus influenced by the hydrodynamic conspicuousness of their prey.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%