Prey density in non-breeding areas affects adult survival of black-legged kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla

Abstract

In migratory birds, environmental conditions in both breeding and non-breeding areas may affect adult survival rates and hence be significant drivers of demographic processes. In seabirds, poor knowledge of their true distribution outside the breeding season, however, has severely limited such studies. This study explored how annual adult survival rates of black-legged kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla on Hornøya in the southern Barents Sea were related to temporal variation in prey densities and climatic parameters in their breeding and non-breeding areas. We used information on the kittiwakes' spatiotemporal distribution in the non-breeding season gained from year-round light-based tracking devices (geolocators) and satellite transmitters, and kittiwake annual adult survival rates gained from a multistate capture-mark-recapture analysis of a 22 yr time series of colour-ringed kittiwakes. In the post-breeding period, kittiwakes concentrated in an area east of Svalbard, in the winter they stayed in the Grand Banks/Labrador Sea area, and in the pre-breeding period they returned to the Barents Sea. We identified 2 possible prey categories of importance for the survival of kittiwakes in these areas (sea butterflies Thecosomata in the Grand Banks/Labrador Sea area in winter and capelin Mallotus villosus in the Barents Sea in the pre-breeding season) that together explained 52% of the variation in adult survival rates. Our results may have important implications for the conservation of kittiwakes, which are declining globally, because other populations use the same areas. Since they are under the influence of major anthropogenic activities including fisheries, international shipping and the offshore oil and gas industry, both areas should be targeted for future management plans.KEY WORDS: Black-legged kittiwake · Pteropods · Capelin · Capture-mark-recapture analyses · Non-breeding distributionResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher FREE REE

Circumpolar dynamics of a marine top‐predator track ocean warming rates

“…This large‐scale shift in the marine environment and associated changes in kittiwake prey availability could have affected kittiwake population trajectories through several, nonmutually exclusive, demographic mechanisms (e.g., through an effect on reproductive and/or survival parameters). Our study emphasized the potential effect of changes in spring SST close to the breeding grounds, but changes in other periods of kittiwake annual cycle may also have played a significant role (Reiertsen et al., ). Spring SST is associated with prey availability in the prebreeding and breeding periods (Shultz et al., ) which could affect kittiwake breeding propensity and/or breeding success.…”

Multi-colony tracking reveals spatio-temporal variation in carry-over effects between breeding success and winter movements in a pelagic seabird

“…To achieve a comprehensive understanding of these fitness consequences, an important future priority is therefore to investigate to what extent the spatial variation in seasonal interactions recorded in this study is consistent across years. An additional priority for future research is to quantify spatio-temporal variation in carry-over effects on demographic rates that we could not consider here, notably survival, breeding propensity and dispersal (Boulinier et al 2008, Reiertsen et al 2014. Furthermore, given their potential to drive both temporal and spatial variation in the strength of carry-over effects, investigating the role of environmental conditions should be a key consideration for future studies.…”

Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds

“…Many species are migratory, making directed movements from breeding to nonbreeding grounds to exploit seasonal peaks in prey abundance or to avoid inclement weather, with implications for survival and subsequent fecundity , Reiertsen et al 2014. The changing degree of central-place constraint during the breeding period -from pre-laying through incubation, brood-guard and later chickrearing (post-guard) -can lead to major shifts in distribution, activity patterns or diet within individuals (Hedd et al 2014, Quillfeldt et al 2014).…”